fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | reply to Ahrenl
Re: What's the big deal? No.. you're just being an idiot now.
"Of course, I know nothing because I disagree with you, I'm probably a terrorist too. I should be wire tapped, arrested w/o a warrant, and sent down to Gitmo."
Could you spare me please...
As to your post... I asked a simple question and you've given NO REAL ANSWER.. do you know what that means? You made a statement "IF THEY'RE UNABLE TO SEPARATE" that implies that they need to.. which I already said they do. ANY business has to know their costs of providing a service or product against the product itself... but like you said... reading comprehension is YOUR friend.. it's already mine.
Now.. go bother someone else. |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | So your question is how my original statement relates to your original? Didn't realize the misunderstanding went back that far.
This was to counter your original assertion The fact is that a operators won't survive is every customer picked the handful of channels they wanted to watch. It cost 'MONEY' to run a metro wide network. . Thus they would have separate fees, as I explained, between network costs and channel costs, and If they're unable to seperate their maintenance costs from their content costs then they need regulation more than ever. I can only assume this answers the question you haven't asked... |
|
|
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | "Thus they would have separate fees, as I explained, between network costs and channel costs,"
To which I stated that they are legally required to bill in a specific way on the statements and can't sell their service that way.. they can't itemize out the network charge from the plant charge. |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | Ok, and we're discussing how to change the regulation, no? |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | not in this branch of the thread... |
|
