Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | reply to fiberguy
Re: What's the big deal? So your question is how my original statement relates to your original? Didn't realize the misunderstanding went back that far.
This was to counter your original assertion The fact is that a operators won't survive is every customer picked the handful of channels they wanted to watch. It cost 'MONEY' to run a metro wide network. . Thus they would have separate fees, as I explained, between network costs and channel costs, and If they're unable to seperate their maintenance costs from their content costs then they need regulation more than ever. I can only assume this answers the question you haven't asked... |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | "Thus they would have separate fees, as I explained, between network costs and channel costs,"
To which I stated that they are legally required to bill in a specific way on the statements and can't sell their service that way.. they can't itemize out the network charge from the plant charge. |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | Ok, and we're discussing how to change the regulation, no? |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | not in this branch of the thread... |
|
