 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | Stupid Lawsuit Didn't this guy read the part of his contract that said that service is not guaranteed? I think this is also mentioned in all of Comcast's ads.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. |
|
|
|
 telcolackey5The Truth? You can't handle the truth
join:2007-04-06
Death Valley, CA | Just more anti-Comcast news from BBR. |
|
| Karl doesn't care for Comcast or its subsidiaries.
Shame on him! |
|
 exocet_cmYou delete it, I'll find itPremium
join:2003-03-23
New Orleans, LA
kudos:2 | reply to telcolackey5
Just more anti-Comcast Broadband related news from BBR news.com relayed via BBR.
Corrected your comment for ya telcolackey5  .
--
"I have measured out my life with coffee spoons..." - T.S Eliot
Check Out the Tech Bench »www.johndball.com/index.php/tech-bench/
Ma blog: »www.johndball.com |
|
 rawgerzThe hell was that?Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA | reply to pnh102
Didn't you think for a second that maybe he was suing because he felt he found a technicality for making money?
How many lawsuits these days are for justice or principle instead of financial gain?
The guy DID lose his internet for two weeks, I would be pissed too. Nothing takes that long to fix.
--
You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority. |
|
| reply to telcolackey5
How is this anti-Comcast news? Sure, the lawsuit is against Comcast, but the opinion of the plaintiff is obviously negative:
Nobody in their right mind could interpret that as meaning that your connection would never go down, right? Wrong. If Karl were posting this supporting the guy, he would have said something like "Everyone just assumes that 'always on' means that your connection will never go down, but apparently Comcast doesn't agree." |
|
| reply to BodyBumper
He doesn't like any ISP. Stories are always about the uber-super fast speeds in a lab or how some one at ISP x screwed something up. |
|
 FiLPremium
join:2005-08-16
Silver Spring, MD | So this ISN'T Broadband news???
And here I am thinking Comcast services the nation with intertubes..... |
|
Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
| said by FiL:So this ISN'T Broadband news???..... why yes, it is broadband news - talk about shooting the messenger! |
|
 Jim GurdPremium
join:2000-07-08
Plymouth, MI | reply to pnh102
This is why companies are forcing customers into arbitration agreements.
I hope Comcast prevails on this. It's a frivolous lawsuit. |
|
| said by Jim Gurd:This is why companies are forcing customers into arbitration agreements. exactly, because they now that they can not provide the service they advertise and do not want to go to court and lose. |
|
| reply to Jim Gurd
One good thing about California - we don't go for that crap. If we want to, and have the money to, initiate a class action against a company for violating law, we can do it, regardless of any terms of "mandatory arbitration". |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | Riiiiiiiiiight...  |
|
 Jerm
join:2000-04-10
Richland, WA
kudos:2 | reply to exocet_cm
yeah, this isn't wikipedia where we pretend to have NPOV [citation needed] |
|
 Sean
join:2004-01-23
Toronto | reply to pnh102
said by pnh102:Didn't this guy read the part of his contract that said that service is not guaranteed? I think this is also mentioned in all of Comcast's ads. Let me ask you: did YOU read YOUR contract? |
|
 MikePremium,Mod
join:2000-09-17
Pittsburgh, PA | reply to telcolackey5
News is news.
Including even if you don't like it.
This is a pretty major claim since "always-on" is a term thrown out with just about everything. |
|
pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | reply to Sean
said by Sean:Let me ask you: did YOU read YOUR contract? Yes.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. |
|
| reply to battleop
LOL Dude that's funny |
|
Aleck79
join:2003-07-23
College Station, TX | reply to Sean
do you read your contract? At the end of it you will see a statement that the contract does not take away certain rights, and it depends on the laws in that state.
I believe in the state of Texas (not 100% on this), a company cannot take away your right to sue.
from some of the other comments i assume Cali is the same way. Any way is this? Who does the arbitration company get their money from? And who would the cable company go to if they see a favorable number decisions going their way?
Arbitration is a joke,
but when they are paid for by like this, their is always going to be a conflict of interest. |
|
| reply to nasadude
Perhaps... but not sure how "fair and balanced" the news posting is on this site. |
|
