<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19581041</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:01:07 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:01:07 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19684963</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/859313"><b>mdrift</b></A> : The Government didn't invent TCP and Al Gore was on the steering committees whose chairmanship lead votes made sure the continued funding for major areas of the future Internet were born.<br><br>At any rate, from RFC675<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc675.txt" >www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc675.txt</A><br><br><blockquote><br>SPECIFICATION OF INTERNET TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROGRAM<br><br>                         December 1974 Version<br><br>1.  INTRODUCTION<br><br>   This document describes the functions to be performed by the<br>   internetwork Transmission Control Program [TCP] and its interface to<br>   programs or users that require its services. Several basic<br>   assumptions are made about process to process communication and these<br>   are listed here without further justification. The interested reader<br>   is referred to [CEKA74, TOML74, BELS74, DALA74, SUNS74] for further<br>   discussion.<br><br>   The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of R.<br>   Tomlinson (three way handshake and Initial Sequence Number<br>   Selection), D. Belsnes, J. Burchfiel, M. Galland, R. Kahn, D. Lloyd,<br>   W. Plummer, and J. Postel all of whose good ideas and counsel have<br>   had a beneficial effect (we hope) on this protocol design.  In the<br>   early phases of the design work, R. Metcalfe, A. McKenzie, H.<br>   Zimmerman, G. LeLann, and M. Elie were most helpful in explicating<br>   the various issues to be resolved. Of course, we remain responsible<br>   for the remaining errors and misstatements which no doubt lurk in the<br>   nooks and crannies of the text.</blockquote>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19684963</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:18:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19582491</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/973490"><b>Ignite</b></A> : The relevance of this to the story is?<br><br>Have you considered a job in PR for GWB's government? Preaching the terrorist angle where possible could be quite profitable for you.<br><br>LINX, London Internet Exchange does over 210Gbps peak as an example. There are plenty of peering points in Europe, and those ISPs that might lose their peering have transit providers to take up their slack.<br><br>The internet is a decentralised network ya know.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19582491</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:53:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19582184</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1189498"><b>jervin123</b></A> : But only when there are alternate routes, many ISPs have few alternate geographically diverse routes. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19582184</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:03:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19582088</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1394754"><b>karlmarx</b></A> : Gee, the 'terrorist' card from a right wing nut case. Who'd a thought!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19582088</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:46:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19581701</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><b>BosstonesOwn</b></A> : It won't do much damage , just introduces more lag , those exchanges are very well peered. If it was the Us , Japan or Brazilian peer exchanges I'd say yes we may have a problem. But there , no we don't. <br><br>We have many in Spain and the UK that can take up the slack , but it comes at a cost of adding latency and cost to the packets.<br><small>--<br> "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19581701</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:47:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19581041</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/392620"><b>aSic</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  BosstonesOwn <A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>TCP protocol is pretty resilient to failures. Thats why the government invented it.<br> </div>You mean thats why Al Gore invented it...  :uhh:<br><small>--<br>Teamwork is a lot of people doing what I say.<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/22ey9l">Who is Ron Paul?</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19581041</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:56:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19580591</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/317310"><b>wierdo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It won't "Knock Out" all e-commerce, but it would put a huge hurt on it for a significant period of time.<br> </div>It will, only if providers are as idiotic as they are here in the states about putting their eggs all in one (or two) baskets. I don't know how things are looking today, but as of a few years ago they by and large weren't being that short sighted.<br><br>Part of the point of a public peering fabric of that nature is to have many of them so that when one dies, it's not a big deal, unlike what happens when one of two or three private links between major backbone providers go out.<br><br>Back when we had that sort of architecture here, full on outages were much more rare. Granted, when one of the IXPs keeled over for whatever reason, latency went through the roof to most off-net destinations, but a complete breakage wasn't as likely.<br><br>I also think it's a mistake for AMS-IX to be that big anyway, but that's because I favor more decentralization of exchanges. IMO, just about every mid-size or larger metro in the US should have one, where the local ISPs exchange traffic with each other and the big outfits exchange traffic in that area. Nobody seems to want to expend the engineering effort to do that, though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19580591</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:49:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19580080</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  BosstonesOwn <A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Theres more interconnects my friend. Just because it is the busiest doesn't mean a terrorist attack knocks out the interweb and ecommerce in europe.<br> </div>It won't "Knock Out" all e-commerce, but it would put a huge hurt on it for a significant period of time.<br><br>An example of companies using the exchange:<br>&raquo;<small>https</small>://<A HREF="https://www.euro-ix.net/member/m/isp/choosing/ixpmembers/search?query=ams-ix&target=ALL&sorting=ORG&commit=Search">www.euro-ix.net/member/m/isp/cho&middot;&middot;&middot;t=Search</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19580080</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:15:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19580030</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737475"><b>BosstonesOwn</b></A> : Theres more interconnects my friend. Just because it is the busiest doesn't mean a terrorist attack knocks out the interweb and ecommerce in europe.<br><br>TCP protocol is pretty resilient to failures. Thats why the government invented it. With it becoming more expensive to buy into 3rd world countries I fully expect some one to start using africa as a major exchange soon. Followed by Spain And Iceland soon it's only logical now. <br><small>--<br> "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19580030</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:06:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19580001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/317310"><b>wierdo</b></A> : More correctly, it acts as <i>an</i> interconnect for over 280 ISPs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19580001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:01:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AMS-IX a key point of failure - becomes terrorist target</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19579977</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : When a hub handles that much of the data for all of Europe then it becomes a high priority target for terrorists. A hit there could affect the economies of the EU significantly if successful. I wonder how well protected it is?<br><br><div class="bquote">AMS-IX acts as the interconnect for over 280 ISPs</div>Current traffic stats: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ams-ix.net/technical/stats/" >www.ams-ix.net/technical/stats/</A><br>Topology(4 separate sites in Amsterdam): &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ams-ix.net/technical/topology.pdf" >www.ams-ix.net/technical/topology.pdf</A><br><br>An example of the companies using the exchange:<br>&raquo;<small>https</small>://<A HREF="https://www.euro-ix.net/member/m/isp/choosing/ixpmembers/search?query=ams-ix&target=ALL&sorting=ORG&commit=Search">www.euro-ix.net/member/m/isp/cho&middot;&middot;&middot;t=Search</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19579977</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:56:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
