Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » Comcast » Comcast HSI » Is Arris Telephony modem really not Comcast compatible ?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[Connectivity] Backbone packet loss in New England »
« [Connectivity] Chicago area uplink interruptions?  
AuthorAll Replies


captain364

@gci.com


from:
Cabal See Profile

reply to Goober
Re: Is Arris Telephony modem really not Comcast compatible ?

said by Goober See Profile :

You still aren't getting it. When you sign up for the service, you promise to either return the equipment or pay for it. It's contractual.

Stealing merchandise isn't contractual. The store has no agreement with you to charge your card if you walk out with merchandise for which you haven't paid.

I swear, schools should have basic contract and torts law classes for you guys before letting you out of high school.
No, your the one who doesn't get it. You are obligated to return the equipment. Just because they charge you that does not relieve the obligation. It is still stolen property and it still is COMCAST'S property. This is pretty basic stuff in our legal system, it is the same in just about all stolen property situations.


Goober
Premium
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL
lol. I guess I wasted 13 years of my life then. Thanks for the legal advice.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20


1 edit
Goob.. you didn't waste 13 years of your life.. what you didn't probably do was look at the 'other areas' of what you spent 13 years of your life for.

I'm sure you know about laws that pertain to specific issues, right? Have you looked at the communication laws that govern the industry...? and what it says when it comes to equipment?

Cable boxes are not available for retail purchase in the US.. well, not the ones you are talking about anyway. They are always the property of the company.. what you pay for is liquidated damages.. but you still don't own the box. You didn't even pay the full price of the box.. step one, the consumer "stole" the box by not returning it. Step two, the company attempts to get it back.. ie: the box is still unreturned/stolen. Step three, they go after the sub to get it.. step four, they charge against your account - sometimes they get paid, often, they don't.

Again, that fee you are charged is not for the property.. and if you want to get technical, it's a 'fee' for not returning the equipment.. not an agreement to "sell" you the equipment.

I respect what you do.. but as you well know, you often fight your own kind and many times, ok, you ALWAYS disagree and are on opposite sides with them.. so you have to say that you don't always know what you're talking about.. well, let me restate that too.. you may know what you're talking about.. but does the man in the black robe and the walnut crusher agree with you?

edit: you didn't promise to return it or purchase it. You also promised that you'd not remove it from the service address with out permission from the provider too. I believe that section of the contract holds weight. As for your shopping example, you violated the contract when you removed the equipment from the property. And where you get permission to move the box is if you call up and transfer service.. otherwise, if you're not going to transfer, yet move, you're then asked to bring it back, or allow the company to retrieve it. But at no time did you agree to return it or purchase it. HD DVR boxes, for example, cost about $650 to purchase.. the company charges you an unreturned equipment fee of $250. I suppose when you walk out of Wal-Mart with goods you put in your cart, but didn't purchase that when they catch up to you, you're only going to get charged 40%?
Forums » US Cable Support » Comcast » Comcast HSI[Connectivity] Backbone packet loss in New England »
« [Connectivity] Chicago area uplink interruptions?  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 07:45:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [194] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [52] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [21] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Tomato/MLPPP v3 alpha 6 released! [TekSavvy]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin(s) for December 8, 2009 [Security]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]