Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » VOIP etc » Voice Over IP - VOIP » VOIP Tech Chat » [Unlock] WRTP54G Unlocked firmware 3.1.27 ETSI
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
11634
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[General] Nothing but a busy signal »
« Telasip down?  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies

GrauerFuchs

join:2008-01-05
·SIP Phone

reply to mazilo
Re: [Unlock] WRTP54G Unlocked firmware 3.1.27 ETSI

The product code in the black block on the right in the header is coded into the firmware. The NA firmware does not show WRTP54G-NA. It only shows WRTP54G. If someone simply wants the privilege of seeing it there, decompile the firmware and in the root filesystem, change the /etc/versions file so that your model_name string includes NA. That's all it is. There's no special hardware check to it at all.

Velund

join:2007-12-02
124365
reply to gratefull
By the way, can anyone check number of Wi-Fi channels available with NA version and with ETSI version? Is there any difference?

mazilo
From Mazilo
Premium
join:2002-05-30
Lilburn, GA

said by Velund See Profile :

By the way, can anyone check number of Wi-Fi channels available with NA version and with ETSI version? Is there any difference?
My unlocked WRTP54G-ER is currently running v3.1.27 (ER version) and only has 1 - 11 channels.

chinusa

join:2008-01-30

I have this router with 3.1.24 firmware, it was from vonage that I bought it on ebay and unlocked by changing its firmware, first version 3.1.17 then 3.1.24

I found the router very unstable, I need to do power cycle once every few days or even once or twice a day. When I am on the phone, sometimes the wireless connection get cut off, etc.

My question is what is the difference between 3.1.24 and 3.1.27 ETSI? Will I be able to use it in the US? Will it solve the problems I am having?

The voip services I am using are voipdiscount, fwd and IPKall.

Thank you very much.

MartyT

join:2004-09-03
Georgetown, SC
I had the same problems with the same router that was flashed to open it up for other providers. I finally gave up and gave it to a relative as a wireless router only. NO VOICE SERVICES.

TOO FLAKY!

mazilo
From Mazilo
Premium
join:2002-05-30
Lilburn, GA

reply to chinusa
said by chinusa See Profile :

My question is what is the difference between 3.1.24 and 3.1.27 ETSI? Will I be able to use it in the US? Will it solve the problems I am having?
Honestly, I don't know. It just happened I mistakenly connected it to the Internet and it got provisioned by ER before I unlocked it.

chinusa

join:2008-01-30

reply to MartyT
said by MartyT See Profile :

I had the same problems with the same router that was flashed to open it up for other providers. I finally gave up and gave it to a relative as a wireless router only. NO VOICE SERVICES.

TOO FLAKY!
I picked this one up for its voip function, should have got a PAP2. I think I will wait for the 3.1.27 NA version.

sokhapkin
Premium
join:2003-05-08
Somerset, NJ

All Linksys adapters have the same bug - if registration failed for some reason it waits too long before retry, looking like dead. The solution - on SIP tab lower the value of "Reg Retry Longs Intvl", I use value 120.
--
»www.callwithus.com

MartyT

join:2004-09-03
Georgetown, SC
I wish it were that simple. I'm afraid there are serious firmware problems with this model that go beyond registration issues.

sokhapkin
Premium
join:2003-05-08
Somerset, NJ
I fixed my SPA-3000 the same way.
--
»www.callwithus.com

MartyT

join:2004-09-03
Georgetown, SC

I've fixed recurrent problems with losing registration using various Sipura models by changing the SIP TI timer value from the default of .5 seconds to one second.

If you look over the board, the WRTP54G has been a real dog in terms of reliability. Apparently, you've had success. Yay!!

chinusa

join:2008-01-30

reply to chinusa
Well, I was using a channel (channel 11) that was not being used by any of my neighbors and the connection kept dropping. Yesterday, I changed it to channel 1, which is being used by some neighbors, (not as many as Channel 6) now I think both my wireless connection and my voip got better...

MartyT

join:2004-09-03
Georgetown, SC
I resorted to turning wireless off to get the voip stuff to work better. It seemed like an improvement, but after a while, the poor voice performance returned. What a waste of time, for me at least.
Forums » VOIP etc » Voice Over IP - VOIP » VOIP Tech Chat[General] Nothing but a busy signal »
« Telasip down?  
page: 1 · 2


Thursday, 03-Dec 15:01:09 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [129] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [103] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [75] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [47] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· PVP in wow today [World of Warcraft]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· Patch 3.3 preperation [World of Warcraft]
· [WotLK] Doing away w/ conquest? [World of Warcraft]