Reviews:
 ·magicjack.com
| reply to rf_engineer
Re: Fanatics said by rf_engineer:If BPL actually used the wireless spectrum you might have a valid argument, but it doesn't, it just pollutes it and makes it unusable for actual users of the spectrum. That's not true. See:
»Catch up on the truth
said by rf_engineer:BPL is for the most part unnecessary and obsolete. Cable and DSL coverage is more ubiquitous and cable and fiber provide more bandwidth. Then the marketplace will resolve it.
said by rf_engineer:To sum it up, you favor a technology that hasn't gotten off the ground in ten years, No. I oppose blind extremism.
Mark
|
|
| said by amigo_boy:said by rf_engineer:If BPL actually used the wireless spectrum you might have a valid argument, but it doesn't, it just pollutes it and makes it unusable for actual users of the spectrum. That's not true. See: » Catch up on the truth No, it's true. You can't escape the laws of physics. BPL will emit whatever frequencies it's using. Notching isn't a silver bullet, it just moves the interference to other frequencies and carriers will undoubtedly turn off notching anyways once capacity becomes an issue. ARRL has been working with a few vendors for quite awhile and some vendors have better systems than others; it's no news flash to those of us who have been following BPL. By the way, Motorola pulled out of Access BPL.
said by amigo_boy:said by rf_engineer:BPL is for the most part unnecessary and obsolete. Cable and DSL coverage is more ubiquitous and cable and fiber provide more bandwidth. Then the marketplace will resolve it. And as we've seen with this article, it is.
said by amigo_boy:said by rf_engineer:To sum it up, you favor a technology that hasn't gotten off the ground in ten years, No. I oppose blind extremism. Call it what you like in an effort to discredit us, but most of us have been studying BPL longer than you've been a member here and understand it quite well. Several of us have actually seen systems in operation and have measured emissions (I can identify chipsets by listening to the sounds and identify some systems by looking at the equipment on the pole). It seems you're here more to pick a fight than actually debate anything of substance. If you don't favor BPL then you're really wasting your time here. |
|
 wolfoxGentle Wolfox
join:2002-11-27
Dunnellon, FL | I see Marky-boy hasn't taken up my invitation, preferring to believe what politicians tell him rather than what REAL world science does. You're arguing with a fool, rf_engineer - please do not let him drag you too down to his level. Mark, my original invitation stands:
»BPL is not goin to help people who save lifes
What have you read so far?
--
The RIAA killed my legal webcast. Sadly it will never be mourned... |
|
