rob in mi
@comcast.net | Another reason Another reason to block javascript. | |
|
 |
 | 
DotMac4
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA | Re: Another reason Better yet how about ISPs not illegally modify copyrighted works. | |
|
| | hottboiinnc
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH | Re: Another reason they didnt modify copyrighted works the insert wasnt in an edited page but a frame type page they added on their own network. they're not doing anything illegal
Its actually nice of them to tell you that you're abot to reach your limit. | |
|
| | |
DotMac4
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA
4 edits | Re: Another reason That isn't what happens.
Rogers using Preftech's methods has to modify Google's HTML to insert the instruction to execute the script. The browser receives the modified HTML with the added SCRIPT line which executes Roger's Preftech doc write-ins filled script which then adds all the crap you see added to Google's page.
Without the original modification of Google's copyrighted HTML to insert the execution line, the execution of Preftech's javascript can't occur.
This is nothing new, this Preftech has been around for years. But in an age where ISPs with break whatever they want or mooch after whoever they want, I see ads coming next. And Preftech advertises their stuff as such.
There is also nothing stopping Rogers from just inserting HTML banner ads instead of java execution commands, making those banners impossible or virtually impossible to circumvent..since you can't tell who added it if it was added at all.
This is just bad all around. | |
|
|
| |
| |
DotMac4
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA
| Re: Another reason They have to modify the HTML to insert the Javascript. It's javascript that obtains and displays the usage data, but the HTML is what contains the instructions on executing the javascript and where it goes on the page.
The ISP is taking it upon itself to inspect, intercept and then modify the HTML page to include their javascript. The modified page then runs the javascript and you get the giant banner. Google's HTML is copyrighted so I don't see how this can be legal. | |
|
|
|
|
·
·
·