DotMac4
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA | reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Another reason
Better yet how about ISPs not illegally modify copyrighted works. |
|
hottboiinnc
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH | they didnt modify copyrighted works the insert wasnt in an edited page but a frame type page they added on their own network. they're not doing anything illegal
Its actually nice of them to tell you that you're abot to reach your limit. |
|
DotMac4
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA
4 edits | That isn't what happens.
Rogers using Preftech's methods has to modify Google's HTML to insert the instruction to execute the script. The browser receives the modified HTML with the added SCRIPT line which executes Roger's Preftech doc write-ins filled script which then adds all the crap you see added to Google's page.
Without the original modification of Google's copyrighted HTML to insert the execution line, the execution of Preftech's javascript can't occur.
This is nothing new, this Preftech has been around for years. But in an age where ISPs with break whatever they want or mooch after whoever they want, I see ads coming next. And Preftech advertises their stuff as such.
There is also nothing stopping Rogers from just inserting HTML banner ads instead of java execution commands, making those banners impossible or virtually impossible to circumvent..since you can't tell who added it if it was added at all.
This is just bad all around. |
|
