<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: why?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19587060</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:09:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:09:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19612513</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : Yes, I'm sure with Hard-drives, it's a "Luck of the draw" type deal and you can find people who swear up and down by a particular brand.<br><br>However, for me, the deciding factor is warranty.<br><br>If one Manufacturer offers 90 days, and the other 3 years, (or better, 5) well, I'm going with the 3 years.  I feel that if the manufacturer is worried enough about the quality of their product to not stand behind it for long then I should be worried as well.   Also, I notice some manufacturers will warranty high end drives for a decent period, but then have a short warranty on their "Consumer grade" type drives.  To me that suggests:  Good quality control for the high end, but low quality/rejects for the "Consumer".   Either way, I call it on warranty.<br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19612513</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:14:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19595563</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : WD is garbage...that they are pulling theses stunts come as no surprise...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19595563</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:02:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19593742</link>
<description><![CDATA[Blackened posted : WD drives always worked fine for me.<br><br>However, this is rather disappointing, and would just ensure my switch to Seagate. <br><br>If I felt like sharing from my network, whether it be approved or not, I should be able to do so without interference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19593742</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 20:11:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19590562</link>
<description><![CDATA[gaforces posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/129458" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=129458');">KrK</a>:</small><br><br>Their drives are crap anyway.  I used to only use WD, then a few years ago, they dropped the warranty down to 1 year or somesuch.. and low and behold I had 2 200 GB drives die while very new.<br><br>I use only Seagate now due to the long warranty.<br> </div>I have the opposite experience, my seagate and maxtor drives have failed, but the WDs and IBM (deathstars) still going strong.<br>Seagate snubs Linux >>  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2007/12/06/seagate-snubs-linux" >www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/&middot;&middot;&middot;bs-linux</A><br><small>--<br>&#145;Do ye, quieting in your bosoms your strong hearts,<br>Who of many good things have had your fill even to surfeit,<br>With what is moderate nourish your mighty desire; for neither will<br>We yield, nor shall you have all else as you wish.&#146;<br>Solon</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19590562</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 09:19:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19589818</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : Their drives are crap anyway.  I used to only use WD, then a few years ago, they dropped the warranty down to 1 year or somesuch.. and low and behold I had 2 200 GB drives die while very new.<br><br>I use only Seagate now due to the long warranty.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19589818</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:56:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19587554</link>
<description><![CDATA[53059959 posted : I know this is beyond stupid. your average joe would toss his music on the drive but it wouldnt work, say "fuck it" and return it from the store he bought it from.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-why-19587554</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:30:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/why-19587060</link>
<description><![CDATA[JJV posted : Why would anyone buy one?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/why-19587060</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:46:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

