amungus
Premium
join:2004-11-26
America
clubs:
| Sad Especially coming from pioneers in the field of such things! These guys are largely responsible for such advancements. To tell them "no" is an affront. Surely they could work out a better deal, like work the morning/afternoon, but if you can do everything else from home, stay there before/after lunch. Save fuel, save company electricity, save time, save headaches, save talented people.
Understandable that they want to kind of consolidate, but this seems like more of a political move. | |
|
 
Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA | Re: Sad They probably figure - correctly - that they can accomplish as much with half the staff. Most telecommuters suck.
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru? | |
|
 | matrix3D
join:2006-09-27
Deep River, CT
1 edit | Re: Sad Funny, the company I work for told me I could telecommute more often. I guess *I* must be doing something right. | |
|
| |
| 
Qumahlin
Never Enough Time
Premium,MVM
join:2001-10-05
united state
| Care to show some stats? Your statement is about as factually as me saying anyone with the forum name Cabal is clearly lazy and unemployed.
In fact if you care to look at the various surveys and studies telecommuters actually DO BETTER then their office counterparts in most industries.
So not only is your statement not backed by facts, but the facts show that its the exact opposite | |
|
| | 
DreamWraith
Premium
join:2004-04-07
Mount Vernon, WA
| Re: Sad said by Qumahlin  :Care to show some stats? Your statement is about as factually as me saying anyone with the forum name Cabal is clearly lazy and unemployed. Not far off... | |
|
|
|
|
·