<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>seems backward in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19617109</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:00:19 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:00:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: seems backward</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19617185</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Just as AT&T doesn't get the FTTH, they don't get telecommuting either.  Old school business - management has to be able to keep its eye on its employees (self preservation).<br><br>I've been telecommuting for an IT company for +3 years now.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19617185</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:45:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>seems backward</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19617109</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : <br>this policy seems very backward, lacking common sense and some logic. oh lookie. an advertisement for u-verse!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19617109</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:33:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
