gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
 ·Cruzio Internet
edit:
December 14th, @12:06AM
| reply to Gilitar
Re: Nobody at the wheel
If it wasnt for Sprint people would still be paying $400.00+ a month for cell service.
Competition is good.
And, its launching >> »telephonyonline.com/home/news/sp···_121007/
Open network, and "Sprint does not restrict their customers from streaming video or P2P file sharing" is a big selling point. >> »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprint_Cor···twork.29 |
|
tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI
 ·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..
·VoiceEclipse
| Even though it said it's for "Sprint employee's", I'm glad they have people using the service first who know what to expect, who to call to fix bumps in the road before we the consumer gets it first. They want to do it right and this is the right way to do it. Test it out in the market with beta tester who know what's going on instead of some techno-geek who wouldn't know the first thing about opening a network trouble ticket to the right group and suggest fixes. |
|
huntml
join:2002-01-23
Mullica Hill, NJ
| reply to gaforces
Indeed. ATTM and VZW's rates, especially data rates, are considerably more expensive, and their data network usage policies are far restrictive than Sprint's are (VZW's are *far* more restrictive).
I have 3 Sprint lines on a shared plan (two dumbphones, one smartphone) and one line (also a smartphone) on a SERO 500 plan; and with unlimited data on three lines, unlimited SMS on all of them, and unlimited MMS (or Sprint's equivalent) on one, and I pay about $130/mo. including taxes, surcharges and 'unfees.'
I've priced out similar services on ATTM and VZW and I figure I'd be paying something over $200 were I to get the same services from either of them.
One wonders what they'd be charging and what their data usage policies if Sprint weren't in the market too. |
|
Fox McCloud
Ron Paul Enthusiast
join:2006-07-23
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Verizon BroadbandA..
| said by huntml  :Indeed. ATTM and VZW's rates, especially data rates, are considerably more expensive, and their data network usage policies are far restrictive than Sprint's are (VZW's are *far* more restrictive). I have 3 Sprint lines on a shared plan (two dumbphones, one smartphone) and one line (also a smartphone) on a SERO 500 plan; and with unlimited data on three lines, unlimited SMS on all of them, and unlimited MMS (or Sprint's equivalent) on one, and I pay about $130/mo. including taxes, surcharges and 'unfees.' I've priced out similar services on ATTM and VZW and I figure I'd be paying something over $200 were I to get the same services from either of them. One wonders what they'd be charging and what their data usage policies if Sprint weren't in the market too. agreed; I pay pay about $100 a month for 3 SERO plans (500 minutes); no other mainstream cellphone carrier in the nation can top this. And why can Sprint do this? Simple; because of their huge data network, which raises massive revenues.
Yeah, Sprint's customer service sucks, but their actual product is beyond amazing. If XOHM plays their WiMAX card right, they'll totally dominate the wireless broadband sector.
by the by, I like your avatar. |
|
huntml
join:2002-01-23
Mullica Hill, NJ | Thx. My *other* favorite is Gengar, but then I'm old school with regard to Pokemon  . |
|
