<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Something like this? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19621412</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:55:34 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:55:34 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Something like this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19627458</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/480231"><b>old_dawg</b></A> : <div class="bquote">WhyMax<br></div> :D :D :D :D<br><br>Ed Zak-er-ly!!!<br><small>--<br>"Our network engineers are aware of the problem..."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19627458</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:42:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Something like this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19625894</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ydoucare <A HREF="/useremail/u/784664"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>What's the right wireless technology at this time?<br> </div>The ones we currently use which have evolved with market demands for the past 9 years. Not WIMAX. It has no target market. Not a single ROI study has ever been done on WhyMax. That is why nobody is buying it. No numbers, no money.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19625894</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:03:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Something like this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19623524</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/784664"><b>ydoucare</b></A> : What's the right wireless technology at this time?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19623524</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:01:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Something like this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19622125</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/569248"><b>huntml</b></A> : Maybe. But the fact is that Sprint/Clearwire are building out 3.5 G networks, and 2 of the 4 national carriers haven't even come close to building out their 3G networks, with one (ATTM) just starting, really, and one (T-mo) still waiting for spectrum to clear and probably not starting in earnest 'til 2010 at the earliest.<br><br>Only one (VZW) has announced anything in the way of 4G plans (LTE), and they probably can't even start 'til 2010 *at the earliest*, due to spectrum issues and the fact that the standards haven't been finalized so the equipment is still on the drawing board (with the exception of a few prototypes here and there).<br><br>You may think that WiMax was the wrong choice, but *if* Sprint/Clearwire roll it out successfully and it gets taken up, they could be on the way to a revision to even higher data rates by the time anyone else in the country has their first generation 4G network built.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19622125</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:05:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Something like this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19621412</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/995903"><b>tmc8080</b></A> : We've both pissed so much money into the wrong bowl (toilet) for wimax (wrong wireless technology) even though it was overhyped and under-delivers.. let's not flush all that cash away.. let's see if we can make it work without pissing away more of our money into it..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19621412</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:58:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
