http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19621487 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:34:26 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:34:26 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19623739 uhmmmmm NO!
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19623739 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:41:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622430 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622430 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:50:45 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622385 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622385 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:45:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622219 said by chakey:

Right, but to offer 100/2 at all? What is the point of that? Just to say they have it...
The blurb says they haven't enabled upstream channel bonding yet. You can pull down 100Mbps with only 2Mbps for the ACKs, so it's likely to offer the fast downstream speeds now, stabilize the network, then enable upstream channel bonding.
--
Pretty Fly for a White Guy™]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622219 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:21:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622196 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622196 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:17:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622170 said by chakey:

That has got to be the most lopsided download to upload ratio I've ever seen. Seems like smoke and mirrors if you ask me.
RTFA. That is for the current Pre-DOCSIS 3.0 offering. The new fiber will be 100Mbps down, 50Mbps up.
--
Pretty Fly for a White Guy™]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-1002-19622170 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:13:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/1002-19621487 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/1002-19621487 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:11:54 EDT