no_one
@QWEST.NET
| reply to djrobx
Re: 1-3 GB a month?
said by djrobx  :Yeah, most of my MP3s are in the 3.5-4mb range, so it sounds like their limit is about 150GB. I hate when companies try to dumb-down/overstate bandwidth limits by putting it in "big number" terms like that. Just tell us what you mean in GBs, please! Maybe someone should go do 299,999 huge RAW-image mode format "photo downloads" and claim that they should be below their stated "excessive use" threshold.  I use RAW in photo as a hobby. I have a two year old. My wife shoots pictures also. Me as in hobby set her camera to RAW. Live with it Qwest. Sharing toddler pictures. Bah humbug. |
|
tkaudio
join:2003-07-17
Ottumwa, IA | reply to Viper007Bond
so far this month i have used allmost 170GB and im now at 970GB for the last 6 months |
|
Viper007Bond
Premium
join:2002-09-26
Portland, OR
| reply to RayW
I'm on Qwest's 1.5mbit DSL (too far away for faster) and with my modest downloading (seriously, my connection isn't doing much a lot of the time), I manage close to that. 95% of what I download is TV shows.
Last month I did 97.3GB down and 85.1GB up (that's 182.4GB combined). That's about average looking at my logs. I haven't heard a word from Qwest.
The limit's gotta be higher than that.
--
I have a signature. | I also have a website/blog. | I even have a computer! |
|
SRFireside
join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX | reply to dadkins
Ahh... your deadpan face threw me off  . Not used to a straight man in your comedy act  |
|
dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA | reply to SRFireside
Sarcasm... I'll edit it to reflect such. |
|
SRFireside
join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX | reply to dadkins
You do realize they don't see 3GB as a limit, right? More like 150GB. If you are downloading 75 massive game demos each month I don't think the ISP is the problem. |
|
dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
 ·Comcast
1 edit | reply to en102
»www.fileplanet.com/168866/160000···eplayer)
The Crysis Demo is 1,813MB! 
God forbid you want to try a couple demos, huh?
[/SARCASM]
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
Jerm
join:2000-04-10
Richland, WA
| reply to RayW
No but really, 1-3gb a month is a VERY realistic number as the "average" person doesn't really sit online that much, and when they do they just check some sites, email, etc and log off. That doesn't add up to much.
IF YOU HAVE FOUND DSLREPORTS.COM YOU ARE ALREADY AN "ABOVE AVERAGE" USER! |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to djrobx
I agree... its a poor attempt at making the numbers look high.
1-3GB (which is their 'average') will be killed in 1 Fedora Core ISO image.
What happens when people decide to run web cams, BitTorrents or Netflix movies, or streaming TV ?
I suspect basic light browsing would consume 1-3GB, but what happens when I want to transfer (or backup) my HD over the web, or send a DVD or 2's worth of info?
Also, frame circuits are really expensive.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission
| reply to Devanchya
said by Devanchya :RayW, the truth is, the 'average' user is a light user. When I worked for the ISP, I figured out one day that most people are on the internet for about an hour a day. It's amazing what the law of averages will do to numbers. Because to get to a "1 hour average" you had to factor in those people who actually Have internet, DSL level, and VERY VERY RARELY use it. It's amazing. As in the famous old saw, "lies, damn lies, and statistics"? I am very familiar with statistics, I see the results of the massaging every week at status meeting.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. |
|
Devanchya
Smile
Premium
join:2003-12-09
Ajax, ON
·Bell Sympatico
| reply to RayW
RayW, the truth is, the 'average' user is a light user.
When I worked for the ISP, I figured out one day that most people are on the internet for about an hour a day.
It's amazing what the law of averages will do to numbers. Because to get to a "1 hour average" you had to factor in those people who actually Have internet, DSL level, and VERY VERY RARELY use it.
It's amazing. |
|
djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
 ·PHONE POWER
 ·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to ironweasel
Re: 1-3 GB a month?
Yeah, most of my MP3s are in the 3.5-4mb range, so it sounds like their limit is about 150GB.
I hate when companies try to dumb-down/overstate bandwidth limits by putting it in "big number" terms like that. Just tell us what you mean in GBs, please! Maybe someone should go do 299,999 huge RAW-image mode format "photo downloads" and claim that they should be below their stated "excessive use" threshold. |
|
ironweasel
Weezy
join:2000-09-13
Belen, NM
1 edit | reply to RayW
said by RayW :I am a light user and we do about that each month, when we are not getting updates. A bit anemic in today's world. I don't read it as limiting you to 1GB - 3GB, Qwest is just saying that the "average" user consumes that much.
40,000 mp3's @ 3MB / file = roughly 120GB. So if you start hitting 100GB of data transfer a month, THEN you might be considered "excessive".
So far this month, as of this post, I have transferred a total of 9.37GB (7.66GB down, 1.71GB up), as an example.
--
But there’s no sense crying over every mistake
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake
EDIT: Meant to post this under IndyMike. |
|
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission
1 edit | I am a light user and we do about that each month, when we are not getting updates.
A bit anemic in today's world.
Edit: I looked at my stats for the last month, 3 GB metered and 12 GB unmetered up and down (metering by time of day and where to). So 15 GB transfer for me for the last 4 weeks. And no music or movies (and no porn despite some people thinking everyone above 100 KB is doing).
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. |
|
