djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
 ·PHONE POWER
 ·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to ironweasel
Re: 1-3 GB a month?
Yeah, most of my MP3s are in the 3.5-4mb range, so it sounds like their limit is about 150GB.
I hate when companies try to dumb-down/overstate bandwidth limits by putting it in "big number" terms like that. Just tell us what you mean in GBs, please! Maybe someone should go do 299,999 huge RAW-image mode format "photo downloads" and claim that they should be below their stated "excessive use" threshold.  |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to djrobx
Re: 1-3 GB a month?
I agree... its a poor attempt at making the numbers look high.
1-3GB (which is their 'average') will be killed in 1 Fedora Core ISO image.
What happens when people decide to run web cams, BitTorrents or Netflix movies, or streaming TV ?
I suspect basic light browsing would consume 1-3GB, but what happens when I want to transfer (or backup) my HD over the web, or send a DVD or 2's worth of info?
Also, frame circuits are really expensive.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast
1 edit | »www.fileplanet.com/168866/160000···eplayer)
The Crysis Demo is 1,813MB! 
God forbid you want to try a couple demos, huh? 
[/SARCASM]
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
SRFireside
join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX | You do realize they don't see 3GB as a limit, right? More like 150GB. If you are downloading 75 massive game demos each month I don't think the ISP is the problem. |
|
dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA | Sarcasm... I'll edit it to reflect such. |
|
SRFireside
join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX | Ahh... your deadpan face threw me off . Not used to a straight man in your comedy act  |
|
no_one
@QWEST.NET
| reply to djrobx
said by djrobx  :Yeah, most of my MP3s are in the 3.5-4mb range, so it sounds like their limit is about 150GB. I hate when companies try to dumb-down/overstate bandwidth limits by putting it in "big number" terms like that. Just tell us what you mean in GBs, please! Maybe someone should go do 299,999 huge RAW-image mode format "photo downloads" and claim that they should be below their stated "excessive use" threshold. I use RAW in photo as a hobby. I have a two year old. My wife shoots pictures also. Me as in hobby set her camera to RAW. Live with it Qwest. Sharing toddler pictures. Bah humbug. |
|
