<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;3crwer100-75 - Such devices should be flagged&#x27; in forum &#x27;3com&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/3crwer10075-Such-devices-should-be-flagged-19627067</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:38:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:38:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>3crwer100-75 - Such devices should be flagged</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/3crwer10075-Such-devices-should-be-flagged-19627067</link>
<description><![CDATA[mongoled0 posted : Just wanted to tell people of my disgust that such products can be released for sale to the public.<br><br>I have toiled with this 'device' for way too long without even the most simple things working as they should. <br><br>If only there was a way to make companies liable for releasing such rubbish.<br><br>3com, your products will no longer be sold at my store as I cannot sell these in good faith to my customers. A batch of 10 were bought of which only brought grief to my business. Even the most simplest of features would not work.<br><br>Each individual device acted differently and all had been updated with the latest firmware. I sat and hoped that 3com would release the firmware to fix this devices, but alas, the last firmware update was January 2007 almost a year ago.<br><br>The number of things not functioning are unacceptable<br><br>Sorry abt the rant had to get this off my chest]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/3crwer10075-Such-devices-should-be-flagged-19627067</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:16:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

