<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>If you can&#x27;t compete on price.... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19628670</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:17:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:17:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: If you can&#x27;t compete on price....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630021</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : so by your statement, you believe Verizon should be able to charge companies for using SIP?  And Sprint should be able to sell licenses for the EXACT SAME patents?  Have fun paying $150 a month for phone service]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630021</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:12:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: If you can&#x27;t compete on price....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630711</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/875322"><b>rrz103</b></A> : I don't believe that is true.  The patenting of an "end result" is essentially patenting an idea--you cannot patent an idea (e.g., flying, time travel, etc.).  However you can patent a process or method which are probably the bulk of the claims made against Vonage.  The "one click shopping" is an example of a process which appears to be the patenting of an "end result" only because it is so short (very few claims).  As a side note, the Patent Office rejected Amazon's "one click" patent in October of this year based on existing "prior art" (i.e., not an original idea).<br><small>--<br>RichardZ @ &raquo;<A HREF="http://richardz.com" >richardz.com</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630711</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:48:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: If you can&#x27;t compete on price....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630371</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/326902"><b>james</b></A> : They keep getting sued because other companies keep getting patents for an end instead of a means. Instead of patenting a specific method of doing something, they patent the end result. It would be like the wright brothers inventing the airplane and then patenting the ability to fly. A blatant example of this is "one click shopping"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630371</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:33:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: If you can&#x27;t compete on price....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19628870</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Why can't vonage compete without using patented technology?  The're getting sued because they keep stealing other companies technologies.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19628870</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:13:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>If you can&#x27;t compete on price....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19628670</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/728884"><b>Maggs</b></A> : Sue the company out of existence, gone are the days of real competition. No more quality service here, just screw the customer.<br><small>--<br>I want this for Christmas... UPC 07464651832</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19628670</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:30:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
