<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Pinging www.rogers.com in Rogers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19630365</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:45:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:45:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Pinging www.rogers.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630612</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/539077"><b>sbrook</b></A> : Not bizarre at all.  A lot of sites and routers turn off ICMP ping responders.  The primary reason is to allocate maximum server and / or router resources to the job they're supposed to do and also to eliminate denial of service attacks from hackers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630612</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:26:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Pinging www.rogers.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630365</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879543"><b>connmen</b></A> : Hi, <br><br>I am on Rogers.  I had some latency issues yesterday but are since resolved.<br><br>To test the net, I had pinged a few sites.<br><br>I cannot however ping www.rogers.com.  The request times out.  As I on the Rogers network, isn't this bizarre?  <br><br>Does this make sense?<br><br>Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19630365</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:31:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
