openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | reply to BF69
Re: Yawn 2.0 There are several discussions regarding subscribing to UVerse and then dropping the TV portion. Comparing AT&T's DSL and UVerse service isn't fair for your price comparison unless you only mean to compare DSL to cable HSI. In our (I'm in BS territory as well) situation, assuming reliable service from both AT&T and the cableco, I'd agree with you that the cost is a wash. The "much better" claim is debatable though. |
|
|
|
 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by openbox9:There are several discussions regarding subscribing to UVerse and then dropping the TV portion. Maybe you can do that. I'm sure the price you pay is a bit higher than $30 if you do. Now if there is someone out there with that info that would be apprciated.
Comparing AT&T's DSL and UVerse service isn't fair for your price comparison unless you only mean to compare DSL to cable HSI. The DSL is 6/512 the uverse is 6/1, not much differnce the comparison is valid. Uverse isn't available where i live and no one has yet produced a stand alone price for uverse internet so I have to go by what data I do have. |
|
