rit56
join:2000-12-01
New York, NY
| It's quiet here today
Now that they stopped this from going through until January all the anti American , pro corporate, strip us of our right to privacy posters are pretty quiet today. Again when a bill or law doesn't go your way you blame it on the party that disagrees with your political point of view. This is about that the current administration breaking the law. you all seem to overlook that fact. well the way the laws are written now it is clear they broke the law and Dodd simply is calling them on it. it astonishes me how a number of people here on this web site find it ok for the government to break the law. the terrorist argument is complete bull and the easiest example of this is that they were doing this well before 9/11 and their spying did nothing to stop it. it would appear that they were not looking for terrorists but maybe spying on Americans who had a different view of things or who maybe they were trying to ruin. they broke the current law and the President wants to offer them immunity. WRONG. if it were Clinton you would be going nuts. What about Specters bill? do you like that? if the Telcos get sued than the tax payers should pay the fine and not the Telcos. you like that? research it. the current administration wants the government to pay all fines levied. WTF? |
|
elijah6
Premium
join:2002-02-14
Lake Wales, FL
|
The neotards like to swarm to sites that publish comments contrary to their ideas. They want to make it seem like there's a whole bunch of people who share view when, in reality it's only a very small percentage of mouth breathers.
fuckin' cowards. |
|
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
 ·Cox HSI
 ·magicjack.com
| reply to rit56
said by rit56  :Again when a bill or law doesn't go your way you blame it on the party that disagrees with your political point of view. It seems like you're the one making this excessively partisan. I'm a registered Democrat, but support what has happened, and support amnesty if the President isn't found guilty of doing anything illegal. I can see AT&T customers suing for breach of contract. But, that's about it as far as I can see. Others had no contract with AT&T. There is no presumption of privacy on the Internet (the reason SSL, SSH and sftp were created), and it doesn't make sense to me to apply punishment to the telcos that can't be applied to the alledged ringleader (Bush).
I think it's time to move on and apply rational controls to what is happening.
said by rit56 :This is about that the current administration breaking the law. If that were true you should find cause for a court of Impeachment. The fact that you can't rise to that level, but continue to make the assertion speaks volumes about your own respect for the law.
Mark |
|
rit56
join:2000-12-01
New York, NY | the current and former Attorney General don't think torture is bad. Do you think they would prosecute anyone from this administration? They are corrupt puppets. |
|
