republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
161
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


DotMac4
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA

So much for the shill claims...

...that cable can't compete with a public muni.

Looks like the muni needs to drop their prices to $99 to compete. If they don't, they deserve to lose customers.


batageek
Slave To The Duopoly
Premium
join:2003-01-25

I guess the only point to be made is that muni's can't directly offer retail service in Utah. They can own the infrastructure, but the retail delivery must be done by the private sector.
--
»www.tricitybroadband.com



morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000

i don't know about that. all they need for success is what telco and cableco have enjoyed for decades: a monopoly enforced by law. then they will thrive and grow even faster, just like telco and cableco did!



batageek
Slave To The Duopoly
Premium
join:2003-01-25

the telcos don't have to share new fiber builds so why should iProvo. Let them offer the service directly.
--
»www.tricitybroadband.com



DotMac4
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA

iProvo is in the infrastructure business where they belong. Content competition is good for consumers. It's up to MStar and others to be competitive.

So long as cable and telco providers aren't engaging in predatory pricing, let the customer churn continue. Perhaps the wholesale rate they're trying to get from MStar is too high.


Tuesday, 29-May 18:39:32 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics