<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Short on information in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19653667</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:06:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:06:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Short on information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19659211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The $800 is a one time cost to run fiber to the home on a new install.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19659211</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:57:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short on information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19653667</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/108284"><b>travelguy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Rogue Wolf <A HREF="/useremail/u/857941"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I was wondering that myself. Surely it can't cost $800 simply to "turn on" the service at an already-connected location? If that's the case, they've got a lot more problems than simple subscriber churn. :huh:</div>Actually, it can. The sat providers figure it costs them around $600 every time they sign up a customer. One reason that's so high is advertising and marketing costs. The other is that maintaining a fleet of trucks and installers isn't cheap, even if all they do is drop of a modem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19653667</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:55:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Short on information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19653031</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/857941"><b>Rogue Wolf</b></A> : I was wondering that myself. Surely it can't cost $800 simply to "turn on" the service at an already-connected location? If that's the case, they've got a lot more problems than simple subscriber churn. :huh:<br><br>I can't believe that Utah is seeing such explosive housing growth that people will build houses, have FTTH connected and then move out before the muni project sees a return on the layout investment.<br><small>--<br>I have learned to ignore such naysayers, when... <i>quelling</i>... them... hm?... was out of the question.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19653031</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:07:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Short on information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19652557</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1381016"><b>Lazlow</b></A> : Is the $800 a one time cost per physical location? If so, once each "house" has had it done then it is no longer an issue.<br><br>Kinda thin on information in this topic.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19652557</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:48:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
