<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: who wants this project to fail? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19656224</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:24:47 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:24:47 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: who wants this project to fail?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19656224</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/295948"><b>ropeguru</b></A> : Exactly.. And that is one reason why corporations that provide this type of service should be limited in size. How can a local provider compete, even if they do build their own infrastructure, when the large corporation can take a loss for a long time in that small area and cover it with profits from everywhere else??<br><small>--<br>FWD#: 223611</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19656224</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:14:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>who wants this project to fail?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19652544</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : incumbents would love to see this fail. it would be the ultimate answer for other cities thinking about a muni system...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19652544</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:46:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
