site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

reply to swhx7

Re: How about enforcing it like the "fleet average"

The NIC and the system most definitely make a difference (I don't think my P133 firewall would perform very well if I loaded up Win XP like you suggest). So does the software running on the system and the "integrity" of the software (think compromised system). Unless you want to give these testers baselined test equipment and ensure it's installed correctly, there is no way to accurately test what you are asking to test.

jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

Yes, and USB cards are pretty slow, too. That's why I'm sure we can determine a good base line machine. A P133 isn't very useful for most people now.


openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

That was my point. Without defining a baseline for a test machine, and ensuring testers have the baselined machine, the test is invalid. And my P133 is chugging along nicely as my BSD firewall with four interfaces. It has no problem passing traffic to max out my 10/1 connection. However, I don't think the same could be said if I loaded Win XP, which was my other point.


Tuesday, 29-May 21:39:19 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics