site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·ALL ·Review Your VoIP Provider ·VoIP Providers ·VoIP FAQ ·Porting Rules ·What Codec?
AuthorAll Replies

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28

reply to Test99

Re: Not Just Trixbox

I'm betting (guessing) that it didn't, and that this is a false positive... Good luck. You could try running it by one of the multi-engine scanners (Jotti).

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function

Test99
Premium
join:2003-04-24
San Jose, CA
kudos:1

said by B:

I'm betting (guessing) that it didn't, and that this is a false positive...
Good suggestion. You may be right. Scans thus far have not detected any other signs of intrusion. Writing malware detection programs must be a difficult assignment.
--
50775@fwd.pulver.com

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28

Maybe, but I suspect the opposite -- that it's astonishingly EASY, at least as it's currently practiced, and that the rewards are so great that no one has to try very hard.

That's why free products (from AVG to the open source ClamAV project) can perform so well, and that's why the mainstream commercial offerings (McAfee and Symantec) are such festering mounds of bloated feces, and that's why the slightest little change in code lets malware continue to slip by the overwhelming majority of "detectors".

Yeah, it's a losing proposition because one person's trojan is another person's remote control feature, but that's not much excuse for today's shoddy state of affairs. When in doubt, just blame Windows.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function


Tuesday, 29-May 21:39:22 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics