| Smaller government and less regulation is needed The ISP needed approval from: the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Office, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Trails and Waterways Division, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Division of Lands and Minerals, each county's soil and water conservation district, and 103 townships and cities in the coverage area. If anybody needs more proof that we need SMALLER government and not more government oversight and regulation, then this is it.
P.S.> All the large multi-state ISP's have to deal with this nonsense on an even large scale than this small ISP.
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
|
|
 woody7Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA | hmmm......isn't this the same crap that ATT says they don't need/want to have to do, unless it is a competitor to their monopoly....God you have to love this $hit, glad they stuck with it. Peace
--
BlooMe |
|
 COMMANPlug Me In
join:2000-07-17
Mount Juliet, TN
 ·Comcast
 ·Callcentric
 ·AT&T Southeast
·Vonage
·Cox HSI
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:If anybody needs more proof that we need SMALLER government and not more government oversight and regulation, then this is it. Amen Brother, AMEN!
Now can we all remember this on election day?
(Of course, judging from the number of agencies cited here, if we eliminated government waste, half the population would be unemployed!)
--
Broadcasting TO the people, FOR the people, BY the people - INTERNET RADIO! |
|
 spamdPremium
join:2001-04-22
Cherry Valley, IL | reply to fAcEtIOUs
»www.ronpaul2008.com/ |
|
| reply to COMMAN
said by COMMAN:( Of course, judging from the number of agencies cited here, if we eliminated government waste, half the population would be unemployed!) Ain't that the truth. |
|
| reply to woody7
Actually it's not. AT&T or Verizon still has to deal with this same crap. |
|
Ulmo
join:2005-09-22
San Jose, CA Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
| reply to COMMAN
said by COMMAN:said by fAcEtIOUs:If anybody needs more proof that we need SMALLER government and not more government oversight and regulation, then this is it. Amen Brother, AMEN! Now can we all remember this on election day? ( Of course, judging from the number of agencies cited here, if we eliminated government waste, half the population would be unemployed!) ... and wouldn't need to be born, either. But, even if they're there, they would get to do less hours per day of more realistic work instead for higher pay, maybe not all at once, but the whole economy would change. |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
It's called doing an environmental impact statement. There is nothing unique or unusual about it.
Fortunately some people are smart enough to realize that they actually do represent a process whereby the public has not only a minimal assurance that companies have at least done a rudimentary analysis of the environmental impact of their projects it also gives the public an opportunity to comment on such projects.
It's not "big government" to ask companies to consider the impact of their projects and anyone suggesting as such is nothing more than a parrot trumpeting a call with no real knowledge of the issues. |
|
|
|
