JasonD
@comcast.net
| reply to DotMac
Re: Shocking
Yeah but think in terms of what those numbers would do to ISP's in the states. Comcast, AT&T, and all the biggies would have a serious meltdown. China Telecom and China Netcom are much better at provisioning and are rolling out 'lightspeed' style broadband at a clip some 15x faster than AT&T, and these are in rural areas as well. |
|
joker5656
join:2006-06-23
Greenville, SC
 ·Charter Pipeline
| said by JasonD :
Yeah but think in terms of what those numbers would do to ISP's in the states. Comcast, AT&T, and all the biggies would have a serious meltdown. China Telecom and China Netcom are much better at provisioning and are rolling out 'lightspeed' style broadband at a clip some 15x faster than AT&T, and these are in rural areas as well.
a lot of China is rural, its a fact, so the Telecoms really don't have a choice |
|
DotMac
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA
edit:
December 24th, @11:24AM
| reply to JasonD
It wouldn't do anything. More numbers equals more subscribers. More subscribers equals more money. More money equals the capital to expand deployment for those customers. |
|
lostinms
Moo
join:2001-11-29
Grenada, MS | reply to joker5656
Well the telecom in china I believe is own by the government since its a communist country after all. |
|
DotMac
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA | That's odd cause here in America the government is owned by the telecoms.
Go figure! |
|
