<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: WOW in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19682015</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:38:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:38:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: WOW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19683269</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1368744"><b>LowRider</b></A> : and for AT&T it will be forever, "cause there is no demand for it"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19683269</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:59:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WOW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19682015</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/862905"><b>Done_Posting</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  thongsai <A HREF="/useremail/u/653870"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>wow is correct.. hopefully they mass produce the product(s) to bring costs down even more.<br><br>This gives telcos less and less reason to stick with copper.<br> </div>I agree, but I want to point out that in my personal experience, most "copper" services are actually delivered via fiber anyway. For example, the DS1's we sell are fiber to the prem, then typically less than 100 ft of copper at the demarc point. The same thing applies to our DS3's and so on. About the only time that I encounter a circuit with more copper on it than that is when we are providing a P2P DS1 to someone outside our footprint; we'll go fiber to a multiplexed handoff point, and then the other LEC (usually AT&T) picks it up from there and delivers it the rest of the way as a copper circuit. For the record, I *hate* troubleshooting those circuits... <br><br>- Tate<br> <br><small>--<br>Happiness is an OC-48 in your basement...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19682015</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 00:14:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WOW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19680681</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><b>S_engineer</b></A> : Most telcos will stick with copper until they are forced to switch. Then they will have the gov't partially or fully subsidize that deployment. The telco circle of life!!<br><small>--<br>Let's pluck 'im and see if he's ripe!"<br>- Larry (MEN IN BLACK, 1934)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19680681</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:52:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WOW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19678970</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/653870"><b>thongsai</b></A> : wow is correct.. hopefully they mass produce the product(s) to bring costs down even more.<br><br>This gives telcos less and less reason to stick with copper.<br><small>--<br>----------------------------------<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.TongSat.com" >www.TongSat.com</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19678970</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:38:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WOW</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19678917</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497683"><b>wruckman</b></A> : This is definitely the next step towards high speeds and availability!<br><small>--<br>William Ruckman<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://ruckman.net" >ruckman.net</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19678917</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:26:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
