 djdanskaRudie32Premium,MVM join:2001-04-21 kudos:4 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·T-Mobile US
| reply to Gygax
Re: Impact on recent 30% Ownership Cable Cap! I thought i read somewhere that this won't increase comcast's numbers at all. These where managed partly by comcast or comcast has something to do with these properties for a long time. Possibly partly owned with insight. someone correct me if im wrong. |
|
 Gygax join:2007-12-04 Pacifica, CA | I would like to find this out as it would be crazy if Comcast started 2008 at over 30% market share with the new regulations. Of course it will all be in court for the next two years before everything is settled. However, what if the courts allowed the FCC rule to be enforced until the case was settled. In the end it looks like cable already won the same case a few years ago and the game has changed so much now - cable competes with telcos, satellite, and even against their own broadband service as more customers watch content online. A recent survey shows 16% if HSI users watch full TV shows online now! 16%!!! It will be really interesting to see what this all looks line in just five years. |
|
|
|
 djdanskaRudie32Premium,MVM join:2001-04-21 kudos:4 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·T-Mobile US
| »news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-6172636.html
While Comcast said the added subscribers will generate an additional $290 million in cash in 2007, the deal actually makes Comcast smaller in the eyes of the Federal Communications Commission. That could bode well for Comcast, as the FCC considers limiting the amount of multichannel subscribers a cable company can have, Moffett said in his note.
"By shedding the attributed subscribers associated with the deal, Comcast actually contracts by 640,000 subscribers," he said. "This comes at a time when the FCC is once again entertaining (to uncertain ends) a long-dormant 30 percent national multichannel subscriber share cap." -- When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all. |
|