<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: current offering in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19687915</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:00:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:00:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19690963</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1450062"><b>SkyBlue</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ronpin <A HREF="/useremail/u/732594"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Sadly AT&T is now locked-in to a "active fiber" network along with the active VRAD field nodes. They <i>could've</i> simply copied Verizon's passive optic network and saved a ton 'o money over the life of the system (as many here tried to tell them). But no, they saved a <i>maybe</i> 50% for now -- only to pay twice as much later to finish the job.<br><br>It wouldn't look so bad if Verizon hadn't already shown them way -- and thousands of others tried to tell 'em. AT&T has no excuse (hell the NSA probably would've paid half! ;0  )<br> </div>AGREED ... thats what happens when you got old guys who pinch pennies running a company do. <br><br>When you run a company the investors are either behind you or not. Either way you tell them you guys wanted me here so I am making the smart decisions. If you don't like it invest your money in Quest stock which is going no where.<br><br>If you want long term profits and lower operating costs and less truck rollouts = less money more profit then build a store so you can sell your product.<br><br>You cant buy a piece of land and make parking spaces without building a walmart people dont' want a flee market they want a store they want a quality product without the hassle.<br><br>If Att is going to offer TV don't pussy foot around buy it and build it. And show the Cable co's this is what competition really is. Give them a run for the money.<br><br>People look at the prices in walmart and say oh yes more for less money i like the idea of that.<br><br>why is walmart so popular? hmm no brainer. <br><br>But there is the other people who want specific items and they go to the specialty store. (bussiness class)<br><br>Other than that Im not going to Target to get the same exact product and pay more just so i can say i went to tar'zjay.<br><br>I just love the idiology. Your shoe wears out get it resouled even if you only save half price as opposed to buying a new pair. Dont they know the upper part of the shoe will wear out soon? NO BRAINER.  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19690963</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 03:17:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19690819</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> : I won't go as far as to say it's crap, but it's extremely disappointing for me.<br><br>I currently record up to four HD channels at a time on my existing cable setup.  I have 10/1 internet.  This <b>brand new</b> freshly deployed system cannot deliver what I have now delivered on a network deployed 10 years ago?  In its current state it is mighty crappy!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19690819</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:06:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19689720</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><b>bogey780</b></A> : Active fiber is pretty good stuff. Who doesn't like 10GBase-T over fiber?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19689720</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:03:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19689545</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1406237"><b>Bocephus</b></A> : i don't need to, all the reports show it you should pay attention]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19689545</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:25:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19688106</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/957524"><b>jgkolt</b></A> : care to back that bold statement up? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19688106</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:18:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19688089</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1406237"><b>Bocephus</b></A> : their u-verse crap is crapand will only get worse]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19688089</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:14:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19688037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/732594"><b>ronpin</b></A> : Sadly AT&T is now locked-in to a "active fiber" network along with the active VRAD field nodes. They <i>could've</i> simply copied Verizon's passive optic network and saved a ton 'o money over the life of the system (as many here tried to tell them). But no, they saved a <i>maybe</i> 50% for now -- only to pay twice as much later to finish the job.<br><br>It wouldn't look so bad if Verizon hadn't already shown them way -- and thousands of others tried to tell 'em. AT&T has no excuse (hell the NSA probably would've paid half! ;0  )<br><small>--<br>50% of Americans vote - 30% are repugs -- do the math.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19688037</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:01:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19687915</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/957524"><b>jgkolt</b></A> : maybe they are doing s steve jobs marketing tactic and make it REVOLUTIONARY every time.  Like the iphone. New interface but come on no replaceable battery? anyways i see similarities.<br><small>--<br>3 free for you/3 free for me: Free Stock Trades : PM Me</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19687915</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:33:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19687721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939879"><b>openbox9</b></A> : I'm sure AT&T is fully aware of the potential of FTTH, but as mentioned, they aren't able to fully justify the cost at this time. I think the current UVerse offering will be great for a lot of customers and will only get better as AT&T deploys to more markets and works out some of the bugs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19687721</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:01:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>current offering</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19687698</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/442639"><b>ztmike</b></A> : I think once they realize the potential of fiber to the home, they will deploy it..<br><br>But till then, they (atat) will stick with their current offering.  <br><small>--<br> "I am the worst president in U.S history, I'm either stupid or dumb most of the time, but people still believe me." George W. Bush</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19687698</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:57:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
