<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: This is not freeware in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19700338</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:52:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:52:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: This is not freeware</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19700338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/223314"><b>HD_Ride</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  GeekGirl1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1434694"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Verizon might not take too kindly with BroadbandReports distributing their software. Caution here. This is not public domain freeware.<br><br>It's probably ready to go, but Verizon needs to follow a proper production release process. Availability via CSR probably indicates a "hot fix" is needed and they bypassed the process.<br><br>I wouldn't want to damage the relationship with Verizon here, especially with the excellent Verizon Direct forum. You may want to consider invalidating the link to the firmware.<br><br>I don't work for Verizon.<br> </div>It&#146;s probably safe to say much of the success Verizon has had with the Fios deployment is in fact due to this forum,  where else does Verzion receive this type of  exposure? it's like free advertising so I don&#146;t see Verizon making a case out this...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19700338</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:28:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>This is not freeware</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19694052</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1434694"><b>GeekGirl1</b></A> : Verizon might not take too kindly with BroadbandReports distributing their software. Caution here. This is not public domain freeware.<br><br>It's probably ready to go, but Verizon needs to follow a proper production release process. Availability via CSR probably indicates a "hot fix" is needed and they bypassed the process.<br><br>I wouldn't want to damage the relationship with Verizon here, especially with the excellent Verizon Direct forum. You may want to consider invalidating the link to the firmware.<br><br>I don't work for Verizon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19694052</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:07:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
