Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » In Favor Of Per-Byte Broadband Billing? » Give Me A Break
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Ulmo

join:2005-09-22
San Jose, CA
·Comcast
·SONIC.NET

reply to nasadude
Re: Give Me A Break

said by nasadude See Profile :

you don't appear to actually understand the statement you are characterizing.

Karl's point is simple:

various entities with vested interests have been warning of the coming "bandwidth crunch" for well over a year now - h/w vendors hype it to sell network management gear; investors and ISPs hype it as an excuse to charge more or get regulatory relief (these definitely sound like agenda based rhetoric). One sure-fire way to solve the "bandwidth crunch" IS TO ADD MORE BANDWIDTH. If these companies profits are above normal and they are paying their CEOs and other executives tens of millions of $$, one would certainly think they could afford to ADD MORE BANDWIDTH.

unfortunately, their agenda is to scare politicians and regulators into giving them more power to milk consumers of even more money.
Sorry I didn't have time to edit my quote of you, but I think you characterized the good parts that I agree with Karl about correctly, except for the wild prediction that they have enough money in all cases to meet any bandwidth demand -- I'd personally temper that a bit, but certainly not much (since lack of supply is acceptable within small ranges of lack). I still disagree with him (Karl) on the point of the ability of usage-based billing to work correctly depending upon implementation. That it is used as a scare tactic is not surprising, since there aren't ample examples of it being properly implemented (i.e., not slanted to favor some people, by heavily shifting resources from some users to others, overcharging (gouging) many, etc.. ... i.e., close-to-cost-based would be best). I said that in my other post.
Forums » In Favor Of Per-Byte Broadband Billing?


Wednesday, 09-Dec 13:34:26 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [76] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [58] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· New PvE Content [World of Warcraft]
· Smoke detectors gone wild [Home Repair & Improvement]
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]