republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Japan: 10.52 Million FTTH Customers » Population density is good for deployment.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies

jersey7

join:2007-05-14


edit:
December 31st, @10:06AM

reply to Gilitar
Re: Population density is good for deployment.

Japan: 872.8/sq mi
France: 293/sq mi
South Korea: 1,274/sq mi
These are the three top countries with the fastest internet speeds.

New Jersey: 1,134/sq mi
How come New Jersey can't offer the same speeds at a comparable price?

Population density is NOT the main reason why the US have not deployed faster internet. It's mostly government policy. We are the only industrialized country in the world with no national broadband plan. We've spend over a trillion dollars in Iraq already. Rather than spend it on some foreign country, we can use a fraction of that to wire the country(and bring actual benefits to our economy).


Dogfather
Altitude is your friend
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

edit:
December 31st, @10:14AM

Uh, last time I looked Verizon FiOS's fastest plans were available in New Jersey as is Cablevision...to the tune of 50Mb I believe.

Remember, FTTH isn't universally available in Japan either.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

reply to jersey7
said by jersey7 See Profile :

We've spend over a trillion dollars in Iraq already.
Blah blah blah. More BDS. Nothing to see here, move along.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.


Dogfather
Altitude is your friend
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
reply to jersey7
Yeah, and we (taxpayers) spend $60B (3X what Verizon will spend deploying FiOS) a year in Medicare fraud and $350B in Federal taxes goes uncollected every year.

What's your point other than a lame political rant?

jersey7

join:2007-05-14

reply to pnh102
said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by jersey7 See Profile :

We've spend over a trillion dollars in Iraq already.
Blah blah blah. More BDS. Nothing to see here, move along.
I used the Iraq factor to prove my point about the government. Remember, countries like South Korea have governments that work with providers in getting out FTTH and other new technologies by helping in funding and encouraging these large-scale projects. I'm not saying we should follow the path of the Koreans. But what I am really saying is that we Americans can do much better that what we are doing now.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by jersey7 See Profile :

I used the Iraq factor to prove my point about the government.
I'm not disputing this. We all got that point was that you believe the Iraq War is a waste of money and that the money we spend on it could be better spent on broadband deployment.

We could make the same point about any other government expenditure. For example, we've spent $7 trillion on the "War on Poverty" since the mid 1960s, but we have far more people getting government benefits now than they did in the 1960s with no end in sight.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.

jersey7

join:2007-05-14


edit:
December 31st, @10:48AM

reply to Dogfather
Why do you interpret it as just a political rant? The whole point is not to simply criticize the government for everything as you have probably portrayed my statement to be, but to prove the point of potential and to explain the insignificance of "population density in deployment".


Dogfather
Altitude is your friend
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·MegaPath
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to jersey7
Americans are doing just fine. Plenty of residents in Jersey can get FiOS and/or Cablevision and those numbers increase every month.

The gov't has much bigger issues to tackle than giving telcos and cable operators billions to supply everyone BT and Pr0N connections.


Dogfather
Altitude is your friend
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·MegaPath
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to jersey7
said by jersey7 See Profile :

Why do you interpret it as just a political rant?
Because it's a political rant.

jersey7

join:2007-05-14


edit:
December 31st, @10:53AM

No, you interpreted it as a political rant and you've failed to recognize the larger point of my post of why population density is not the deciding factor others perceived it to be. I acknowledge that I went on a short, small tangent with the government. However the main point still stands.


Dogfather
Altitude is your friend
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
A political rant by any other name is just as lame.

jersey7

join:2007-05-14

And a deliberate misinterpretation isn't?
I'm not going to sit with you and argue with you. The fact that you can't see the whole point even after my reiteration for my original reply demonstrates your lack of understanding and carelessness to even read the post and my reply throughly as I intended other readers to understand the point.


Richard B
Fur It Up

join:2007-06-22
Portland, OR
·Comcast

reply to jersey7
said by jersey7 See Profile :

Japan: 872.8/sq mi
France: 293/sq mi
South Korea: 1,274/sq mi
These are the three top countries with the fastest internet speeds.

New Jersey: 1,134/sq mi
How come New Jersey can't offer the same speeds at a comparable price?

Population density is NOT the main reason why the US have not deployed faster internet. It's mostly government policy. We are the only industrialized country in the world with no national broadband plan. We've spend over a trillion dollars in Iraq already. Rather than spend it on some foreign country, we can use a fraction of that to wire the country(and bring actual benefits to our economy).
Let me put it bluntly Government has the responsibility to protect it citizens hence spending in Iraq. Government has no damed business screwing around with the free market. There is no right to broadband in the Constitution. I do want government to
1. Define what is broadband
2. Tell me via government planning, what kind of broadband I need I know my needs.
3. Force any American via government planning and taxes, to spend on broadband infrastructure for and dubious unproven economic benefits.
4. plan such networks: socialism never works.
You are free to start you own business and by an OC-12 line if you think what the telecoms provided is not fast enough. Just do not involve my tax dollars.


Dogfather
Altitude is your friend
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
reply to jersey7
Oh, I read the post and clearly saw your point, which as to Bush bash.

Do everyone a favor and save the political rants for the Red and Blue rooms.

mglunt

join:2001-09-10
Fredericksburg, VA
reply to jersey7
We get your point. You hate Bush and Oh yeah, you want Socialized Broadband.

jersey7

join:2007-05-14

reply to Richard B
I apologize for writing the message quickly, but however in a response I have stated that we don't need to follow the system(of the Koreans which is government involvement), but we of course need 'something' that works. I fully understand and respect your standpoint in pure-capitalism and the wonders it has provided for America in the 20th Century. Coming back to my original reply to this thread, blaming our inaction and our poor standing in the world in the 21st Century should not be blamed on 'population density' alone.


Dogfather
Altitude is your friend
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·MegaPath
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable


edit:
December 31st, @11:31AM

The system works just fine. I've had multi-megabit service from Cox for OVER 10 years. Already millions of people can get FTTH and tens of millions more can get multi-megabit service from competitors and those numbers are increasing by millions a year.

There is no crisis to be solved.

jersey7

join:2007-05-14
reply to mglunt
And you must believe pure-capitalism. That is OK. What isn't OK is what's happening at the moment with the state of broadband in the US.


Mike
Premium,Mod
join:2000-09-17
Pittsburgh, PA
clubs:
reply to jersey7
Blowing things up is more fun than loading a youtube of some slow kid blowing his hand up with a firecracker in 3 seconds, right? right???


S_engineer

join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

Sure, in 5 years that same kid is costing the taxpayers even more money running a tab through our legal system. This way he's saving the taxpayers money by having less fingers to fingerprint!
--
Let's pluck 'im and see if he's ripe!"
- Larry (MEN IN BLACK, 1934)
Forums » Japan: 10.52 Million FTTH Customers
page: 1 · 2


Wednesday, 03-Dec 00:13:10 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] AT&T Metered Billing Trial Hits Second Market
· [88] UDP BitTorrent Will Destroy The Interwebs!
· [76] EFF Challenges Telecom Immunity
· [61] Comcast Tries To Slow Verizon's Philly Entry
· [40] Cablevision Bumps HD Count To 68
· [38] T-Mobile Invisible Caps Return
· [37] Comcast To Offer Bandwidth Use Tracker In January
· [36] Verizon Tops Consumer Reports Wireless Satisfaction Ratings
· [28] Mega-ISPs, Consumer Advocates Demand Broadband Plan
· [26] Hawaii Telecom Files For Bankruptcy
Most people now reading
· [Rant] Bestbuy receipt checker [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· Is this a good thing for the net? [news,99366]
· Coalition Government Possible? [TekSavvy]
· Notice, new uTorrent Alpha may be able to evade throttling [TekSavvy]
· Level 80 PVP gear info? [World of Warcraft]
· It's official ... Macs need anti-virus software [Security]
· [WotLK] Starting the Rep Grind [World of Warcraft]
· Java SE Runtime Environment (JRE) 6 Update 11 [Security]
· [WotLK] New Hunter Macros [World of Warcraft]