republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

jersey7

join:2007-05-14

reply to mglunt

Re: Population density is good for deployment.

And you must believe pure-capitalism. That is OK. What isn't OK is what's happening at the moment with the state of broadband in the US.


S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

said by jersey7:

What isn't OK is what's happening at the moment with the state of broadband in the US.
Man...the state of broadband is the least of our problems.
A war that some people in our own country want us to lose...
Healthcare that is out fiscally out of control...
A social security system that is fiscally out of control...
Federal, State , County, Municipality budgets that are fiscally out of control...
Homeless people, unemployed people, kids that have the motivation of a pea...

But you're right, the state of broadband should take the front burner!!! :{


anon666

@sbcglobal.net

reply to jersey7
Here's a better argument for ya...

The federal government spends over $250 BILLION a year on the roads, highways, etc. and that's including all the BS pork projects of the politicians. And yet they can't even fix all the roads and bridges that are falling apart or falling down (remember the bridge in Minnesota?) and killing people. And what happened to the levees in New Orleans? Money was supposedly allocated to the tune of $2 Billion worth to fix them 10 or 15 years ago because the Army Corps of Engineers said the levees were not up to par. But in the end, the money was not actually spent on them and we all know what happened to New Orleans.

Now these are all so-called GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITIES and are more important than providing broadband to the masses which is NOT a government responsibility!!! And still the government FAILS miserably in these and many other projects. So before you go on and on about the money being spent in Iraq - which by the way is also a government responsibility (its called national defense) and is also currently succeeding believe it or not, you think about how they spend or don't spend money now on other REAL issues in the U.S. that should be handled by the government unlike broadband which should be left up to the free market.

So don't tell me money is being wasted in Iraq and should instead be spent on broadband.



S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

Hey anon.....I'll top that with the "darwin gov't responsibility list"....the big dig in boston.

"When Congress originally approved construction of the project, it was to cost $2.5 billion and be completed by 1998. According to the audit, the project's total cost could reach a staggering $13.6 billion - $2.8 billion more than projected just six months ago "

Great...just freakin great!
--
Let's pluck 'im and see if he's ripe!"
- Larry (MEN IN BLACK, 1934)



KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

This is what happens when you let corporations feed at the public trough. They will take as much as they can get.


Diddy1

join:2003-07-19
Sidney, NE

reply to anon666

said by anon666 :

you think about how they spend or don't spend money now on other REAL issues in the U.S. that should be handled by the government unlike broadband which should be left up to the free market.

Well said.
--
if you fail to plan, you plan to fail

Tuesday, 29-May 11:28:03 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics