<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>jus another failure in the making? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19729893</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:40:34 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:40:34 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>jus another failure in the making?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19729893</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/489959"><b>nasadude</b></A> : article doesn't give any details about pricing, DRM, universal availability, etc.<br><br>right now, no reason to believe this will be any more successful than any other attempt. It's a nice dream they have about TVs with wireless, but it's just that - a dream. I imagine the studios will have their lawyers carefully scrutinizing any attempt to make it easier for consumers to download and watch movies on a big screen TV.<br><br>Edit: ran across an article in WSJ, "Wireless HDTVs to be on view at Tech Show" that contains this: "To satisfy concerns of the MPAA...WirlessHD has intentionally limited the range of the technology"<br><br>As long as the MPAA has power to influence standards and technology, it's going to be a long while before this "convergence" is mainstream. This probably could have happened a couple of years ago if the studios were rational about digital video.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19729893</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:33:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
