partysource
join:2000-11-25
Phoenix, AZ | Oh Nice...
The real question is..When will DOCSIS 3.0 finally come to the USA? |
|
MacLeech
The one and only
Premium
join:2001-07-14
SoCal
1 edit | When both ends of the connection equipment are certified for it.
Many of the current CMTSs cable companies use can be upgraded to DOCSIS 3.0 without total replacement of the gear, but there aren't any real DOCSIS 3 modems certified or available yet.
...
1 Ghz tuners, MPEG4, SDV, and DOCSIS 3.... that should work out nice with all the recent upgrades I've seen TWC doing lately. Wonder if Verizon FIOS will do anything with those new boxes.... I'm sure they'd like MPEG4 and 150 Mhz of extra channel space. |
|
swintec
Premium
join:2003-12-19
Alfred, ME | reply to partysource
Boy those set top boxes sure look slick. That new modem is huge, but I guess its needed when you pack that many functions into it.
--
BlockNews.Net- Quality Usenet Block And Unlimited Accounts |
|
backfeed
is giving feedback
join:2002-12-16
Peru, IN
 ·Comcast Digital Vo..
 ·Comcast Formerly ..
| I would imagine that the bulk comes from the onboard battery backup, They are needed for Digital voice applications, The Arris modem that Comcast uses is of a similar size and shape. They seem to work pretty well also.....
--
ERROR: Out of Memory... Should I forget Something (Y,y)? |
|
Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA
| reply to partysource
Refresh my memory
Obviously more compression = more data in the same bandwidth, but does MPEG-4 offer lossless compression or just lossy? I'd think people would be clamoring for uncompressed, higher quality HD content.
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru? |
|
nanoflower
join:2002-07-14
30876
| MPEG is designed for lossy compression. It's just designed so that you won't notice the compression unless the video is highly compressed. Given the desire to keep adding more channels I don't think you will ever see uncompressed HD video on cable or satellite.
To get back to what you probably meant to say, I don't think you will see lossless HD video on cable or satellite. Maybe a channel or two for special events but the majority will be heavily compressed so they can put in more HD channels. Now with Switched Digital Video they might could go to uncompressed video, or lossless compressed video but I doubt that will happen. |
|
Ulmo
join:2005-09-22
San Jose, CA
2 edits | reply to MacLeech
...
(post edited to delete (other posters better)) |
|
davoice
join:2000-08-12
Saxapahaw, NC
 ·Comporium
| reply to backfeed
Re: Oh Nice...
Actually it's about twice as thick as an Arris. But remember it has a built in cordless base station. The batteries really aren't that big. The one in my Arris is smaller than my camcorder battery.
The size is partly for ventilation. There is a lot of air space in the cases of these units. All of those electronics operating inside a single case generate a lot of heat. The heat is increased further when the battery is charging or discharging (i.e. being used for backup purposes).
}Davoice |
|
davoice
join:2000-08-12
Saxapahaw, NC
·Comporium
| reply to nanoflower
Re: Refresh my memory
For most people the compression isn't visible. What is visible is how well the signal is handled before and after it gets compressed.
A first generation transcode of a 1080i uncompressed feed compressed w/ MPEG4 looks pretty much as stunning as the original (except for fast motion).
The big problem is that in most cases the cable company (and the satellite providers to some extent) is recompressing and retranscoding a signal that has already been compressed or degraded somewhere else along the way.
Here, DirecTV and DishNetwork have an advantage when it comes to national channels. They only have to get the original signal back to 1 main location. For the cable companies they need that same national signal available to each and every head-end. That enables the satellite companies to spend a little more to get a good signal back for those channels - i.e. direct fiber feeds from the originating programmers instead of pulling it off of c-band or similar.
Now for local channels it's the opposite. Satellite companies have to push all these local broadcasts back to their main hub. Pulling all those locals in costs a lot of money. To maximize capacity, most of them are highly compressed in transit. The cable companies can pull the native format signal out of the air locally with much less trouble and potentially no backhaul. Or for larger/remote cities they may have a fiber feed from the local TV station.
}Davoice |
|
