gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
2 edits | reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Giving away WiFi to neighbors breaks TOS for most ISPs
This is San Francisco yer talkin about, if the ISP's don't co-operate, they will get backlash from the gay right's groups. If the city chooses to allow this, not much ISP's can do if a majority of the city shuns them, they are out of business there.
A good portion of SF is already covered by the university wireless.
Meraki has an advantage as they are the hardware supplier, and the network operator. If they can make their business model work there, it will work in other city's.
--
‘Do ye, quieting in your bosoms your strong hearts,
Who of many good things have had your fill even to surfeit,
With what is moderate nourish your mighty desire; for neither will
We yield, nor shall you have all else as you wish.’
Solon |
|
John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
 ·CenturyLink
1 edit | reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail  :I don't imagine this will fly with most(not all) ISPs. I expect that one or more ISPs will make a point of disconnecting a number of users and publicizing that fact to scare off the majority of users from taking part. I guess you didn't see this:
The San Francisco network, for example, can feature one DSL line that supports anywhere from 10 to 50 repeaters. With the mesh structure, Meraki also can reroute traffic to avoid any malfunctioning antennas. This gives the network stability and reach at a low cost. With the San Francisco project, Meraki also will pay for the Internet access so users won't be asked to share their personal Internet connection.
»www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c···ype=tech
EDIT: Fix link...
--
A is A |
|
jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04
USA
| reply to TKJunkMail
It would be difficult to enforce the proposed federal legislation that was circulating the news recently. The one which would fine joe6pack with open access points 150k for potentially allowing child porn d/l porn and whatever else the gov't doesn't like.
People already pay for their internet connection. Billing-by-the-byte would either kill the internet, or seriously castrate it. That would be a very stupid model at this point. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
2 edits |  I don't imagine this will fly with most(not all) ISPs. I expect that one or more ISPs will make a point of disconnecting a number of users and publicizing that fact to scare off the majority of users from taking part.
Or they can go to bill-by-byte. If you want to let freeloaders use your connection, then you can pay thru the nose for being generous.
I support the 2nd option as being more fair and seeing how generous people are when it is THEIR money instead of the ISPs that is being contributed to free WiFi.
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
