Reviews:
 ·Embarq Now Centu..
| lol I just noticed a funny typo on the Xohm site at: »www.xohm.com/xohm_learn_technology.html
"WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads" Typo in bold. lol |
|
| said by ydoucare:I just noticed a funny typo on the Xohm site at: » www.xohm.com/xohm_learn_technology.html"WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads" Typo in bold. lol I'd be ok with those speeds, although I know it's just a typo, would sure give the other services a run for their money if it were true. |
|
 TuPaK
join:2002-07-21
San Gabriel, CA | 1.5mbps would be nice.
that's about as fast of DSL I can get. (11.5K ft. from CO)
with overhead it's like 1.25mbps (~150 KB/sec) |
|
| "WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads"
What was meant by this was that if it were megabytes per second, we would be seeing 16mbps download and 8mbps upload. Although this is a major typo on Sprint/Xohm's part, and should be fixed. I would be immensely happy with the speeds if I could get them over WiMAX |
|
TuPaK
join:2002-07-21
San Gabriel, CA
2 edits | orly |
|
| reply to whiteyonenh
While it is indeed a typo, 8-15Mbps on WiMAX is technically possible, but Sprint won't be building the infrastructure for it (at first). There is an 802.16m WiMAX spec in the works that will theoretically go to 1Gbps. We won't see that but it might be used for backhaul down the road. |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | reply to whiteyonenh
said by whiteyonenh:said by ydoucare:I just noticed a funny typo on the Xohm site at: » www.xohm.com/xohm_learn_technology.html"WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads" Typo in bold. lol I'd be ok with those speeds, although I know it's just a typo, would sure give the other services a run for their money if it were true. People, the truth is out, or you all have been blind by the PR. NO TECHNOLOGY ever operates at advertised speed. The 70Mbps they claim, well, thats if there is 1 and only 1 user on the tower using the entire pool of bandwidth. The only place thats happening is in a lab room or convention hall. |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to TuPaK
You should be able to get 3Mbps at that range if you have a decent signal. I'm on 3008/512kbps and I'm at 12,000' from the CO. I'm hitting ~2.5Mbps.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to patcat88
I agree... even the advertised speed is typically the physical data rate. Eg. How many people with 100Mbps ethernet actually obtain 100Mbps throughput. Answer: NONE.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
1 edit | reply to patcat88
said by patcat88:said by whiteyonenh:said by ydoucare:I just noticed a funny typo on the Xohm site at: » www.xohm.com/xohm_learn_technology.html"WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads" Typo in bold. lol I'd be ok with those speeds, although I know it's just a typo, would sure give the other services a run for their money if it were true. People, the truth is out, or you all have been blind by the PR. NO TECHNOLOGY ever operates at advertised speed. The 70Mbps they claim, well, thats if there is 1 and only 1 user on the tower using the entire pool of bandwidth. The only place thats happening is in a lab room or convention hall. Who is debating you on this? I don't understand who you are trying to point this towards. |
|
| Good question. |
|
| reply to mAlfunkti0n
said by mAlfunkti0n:Who is debating you on this? I don't understand who you are trying to point this towards. Who are you addressing your question to ? |
|
1 edit | The person he quoted. |
|
