lol in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19768362 en Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:36:53 EDT Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:36:53 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19778261 ydoucare : The person he quoted.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19778261 Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:16:41 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19777853 anon :
said by mAlfunkti0n See Profile :

Who is debating you on this? I don't understand who you are trying to point this towards.
Who are you addressing your question to ?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19777853 Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:12:38 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19770891 ydoucare : Good question.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19770891 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:24:45 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19769578 mAlfunkti0n :
said by patcat88 See Profile :

said by whiteyonenh See Profile :

said by ydoucare See Profile :

I just noticed a funny typo on the Xohm site at: »www.xohm.com/xohm_learn_technology.html

"WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads"


Typo in bold. lol
I'd be ok with those speeds, although I know it's just a typo, would sure give the other services a run for their money if it were true.
People, the truth is out, or you all have been blind by the PR. NO TECHNOLOGY ever operates at advertised speed. The 70Mbps they claim, well, thats if there is 1 and only 1 user on the tower using the entire pool of bandwidth. The only place thats happening is in a lab room or convention hall.
Who is debating you on this? I don't understand who you are trying to point this towards.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19769578 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:51:06 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19769149 en102 : I agree... even the advertised speed is typically the physical data rate. Eg. How many people with 100Mbps ethernet actually obtain 100Mbps throughput. Answer: NONE.
--
Canada = Hollywood North]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19769149 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:48:16 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19769122 en102 : You should be able to get 3Mbps at that range if you have a decent signal. I'm on 3008/512kbps and I'm at 12,000' from the CO. I'm hitting ~2.5Mbps.
--
Canada = Hollywood North]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19769122 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:45:53 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19769121 patcat88 :
said by whiteyonenh See Profile :

said by ydoucare See Profile :

I just noticed a funny typo on the Xohm site at: »www.xohm.com/xohm_learn_technology.html

"WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads"


Typo in bold. lol
I'd be ok with those speeds, although I know it's just a typo, would sure give the other services a run for their money if it were true.
People, the truth is out, or you all have been blind by the PR. NO TECHNOLOGY ever operates at advertised speed. The 70Mbps they claim, well, thats if there is 1 and only 1 user on the tower using the entire pool of bandwidth. The only place thats happening is in a lab room or convention hall.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19769121 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:45:43 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768595 xenophon : While it is indeed a typo, 8-15Mbps on WiMAX is technically possible, but Sprint won't be building the infrastructure for it (at first). There is an 802.16m WiMAX spec in the works that will theoretically go to 1Gbps. We won't see that but it might be used for backhaul down the road.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768595 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:24:19 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768578 TuPaK : orly]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768578 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:22:00 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768570 whiteyonenh : "WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads"

What was meant by this was that if it were megabytes per second, we would be seeing 16mbps download and 8mbps upload. Although this is a major typo on Sprint/Xohm's part, and should be fixed. I would be immensely happy with the speeds if I could get them over WiMAX]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768570 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:20:41 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768514 TuPaK : 1.5mbps would be nice.
that's about as fast of DSL I can get. (11.5K ft. from CO)
with overhead it's like 1.25mbps (~150 KB/sec)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768514 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:12:28 EDT Re: lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768425 whiteyonenh :
said by ydoucare See Profile :

I just noticed a funny typo on the Xohm site at: »www.xohm.com/xohm_learn_technology.html

"WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads"


Typo in bold. lol
I'd be ok with those speeds, although I know it's just a typo, would sure give the other services a run for their money if it were true.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768425 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:59:05 EDT lol http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768362 ydoucare : I just noticed a funny typo on the Xohm site at: »www.xohm.com/xohm_learn_technology.html

"WiMAX technology will deliver true high speed broadband. With expected speeds of 2-4 megabytes per second for downloads and 1-3 megabytes per second for uploads"


Typo in bold. lol]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19768362 Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:47:39 EDT