Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Vermont, FCC Ok Fairpoint Deal » Deal has to go forward
Uniqs:
150
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Broadband Deployment »
« vote split  

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


2 edits

Deal has to go forward

This deal had to be approved. If it wasn't, then service is GUARANTEED to degrade as Verizon just walks away from doing ANY upgrades or spending any REAL money on maintenance.

But prices will go up and some union drones will lose their jobs, because Fairpoint won't do what Verizon did - subsidize an area that was losing money thru higher rates in more profitable areas.
probboy

join:2008-01-10
Natick, MA

Re: Deal has to go forward

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

This deal had to be approved. If it wasn't, then service is GUARANTEED to degrade as Verizon just walks away from doing ANY upgrades or spending any REAL money on maintenance.
They just can't walk away--landlines are a tariffed service. They might not invest in non-tariffed services (like DSL or FIOS), but they would have to meet minimum service standards for landlines. I'm not entirely sure what the penalties are for not meeting these standards, but I'd imagine that they might include seizing the assets and allowing another company to provide service.

The folks in Northern New England end up getting screwed while Verizon walks away from a boatload of debt. Once this gets approved, I'd imagine that Verizon tries something similar in western Massachusetts, central PA, etc.

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: Deal has to go forward

said by probboy See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

This deal had to be approved. If it wasn't, then service is GUARANTEED to degrade as Verizon just walks away from doing ANY upgrades or spending any REAL money on maintenance.
They just can't walk away--landlines are a tariffed service. I'm not entirely sure what the penalties are for not meeting these standards, but I'd imagine that they might include seizing the assets and allowing another company to provide service.
Who? Fairpoint?
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
Forums » Vermont, FCC Ok Fairpoint DealBroadband Deployment »
« vote split  


Thursday, 10-Dec 13:25:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [131] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [75] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [67] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [45] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· [WIN7] Well, I was dumb, but do I have recourse? [Microsoft Help]
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· Will Gearscore die now? [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Battered Hilt Delimma [World of Warcraft]
· Icecrown 5-man strats [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· 60GB would only last us two days! [TekSavvy]