republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Adds 'Line Inspection Fee' To Landline Bills » I CALL BS
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Chuckles
Premium
join:2006-03-04
Saint Paul, MN
reply to DHRacer
Re: I CALL BS

Why not? Customers are a flock to profit from. A company has every right to pass whatever charges it wants to the customer.
--
kustomerservice.net

matrix3D

join:2006-09-27
Deep River, CT

2 edits
Yes, and customers also have the right to tell the company to shove it and take their business elsewhere. Unless, of course, that company is the only choice for service in that area. Hm...


Sabre
Di relung hatiku bernyanyi bidadari

join:2005-05-17
·Comcast

reply to Chuckles
Yep, they sure can. So let them make it part of the advertised cost.

This is NOT about whether companies have the right to make money and charge what they want. AT&T is completely within its rights. The issue here, and what makes it -wrong- (NOT illegal, just -wrong-) is this surfeit of "fees" as distinguished from "cost". What is argued by many (and I happen to agree with it) is, charge what you want. But SAY that's what you're charging. Go ahead and break it out on the bill, if you want. But DON'T try to create the farce that you're "charging" some amount of dollars for the service you're providing, and then tack on fee after fee to push the price higher.

Telcos do it. Airlines do it. Mail-order companies do it. It's not an AT&T thing. It's still wrong, whoever's doing it. Charge us an amount, say it up front, and be honest about it. That's all I ask for. If it costs me $57.23 per month, $89.10 per month, whatever, just say it. But if you tell me I'll pay $10.95 or whatever, then that should be what's on my bill.
--
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world.

Save American Soccer - Stop the MLS!

justgold79

join:2008-01-13
okay, but I __highly__ doubt this is advertised, it was most likely hidden and probably can be taken off if you raise all kinds of hell with them.
Forums » AT&T Adds 'Line Inspection Fee' To Landline Bills


Thursday, 03-Dec 01:41:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [95] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [58] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [39] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Poll: Have you ever been charged an overage fee since ... [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 changing the way Firefox runs? [Mozilla Software]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 16% packet loss. damn dsl. los angeles [AT&T West]
· Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here [Comcast HSI]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]