<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Too bad in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19786980</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:10:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:10:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Too bad</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19786980</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1236971"><b>amigo_boy</b></A> : I live in Tempe. I tried Kite for a month (a year ago). It worked ok using a directional antenna and their wireless modem (with higher power than a normal device). But, whenever there was wind it was unusable. <br><br>I didn't have line-of-sight to the access point on the light pole 90 yards away. I suspect my signal was based on reflections. When the wind blew, it caused the reflections to move (trees moving, etc.).<br><br>Their customer support was good. I always got someone quickly. They refunded all my money when I canceled and returned the device. They didn't even charge me for the month.<br><br>I didn't realize Kite sold it to someone else since then. It doesn't surprise me they want out. I don't think anyone in my neighborhood is using it. I don't see how they can make it successful without putting an AP on every lightpole and/or offering exterior installation services using directional antennas.<br><br>Mark]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19786980</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:30:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
