Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » World's Ten Largest IPTV Providers » Cue the "USA Sucks" Whining!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Anyone know?  
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Navarre, FL
·AT&T Southeast
·Mediacom

reply to KrK
Re: Cue the "USA Sucks" Whining!

But it is about having to live like the French, because you don't get to have your cake and eat it too. I would love to have everything that I have now and pay a 1/3 of the cost for my televion, ISP, and voice, but that's not the world we live in. If somebody comes up with a plan to make that a reality, then I'm all for it.


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest


edit:
January 15th, @09:45PM

The idea is competition. The French encouraged and the Government backed up local loop unbundling which opened the door for competition. That competition was originally riding the existing Telco lines, but as they got their footing, they began building out their own networks and fiber and now you have the result --- modern, competing telecommunications services resulting in more options and lower prices.

WE were OH so close here.... We started down that path... and providers were starting to buildout their own networks... but our Government backed off protecting the fledglings from the ravages of the ILEC's and gave up on local loop unbundling-- that, combined with the dot com crash, and boom all the startups (A few barely hanging on, IE Covad) went under, and we reap the rewards today-- only a few choices, no options, and high prices.

It's sad. With just a little more leadership from the Administration and the FCC we'd be right where the French are now-- hell, we'd be better off, IMHO because we started first and because we have many content producers here.

Oh so close... but we dropped the ball.

We could have it, down the road, but it requires action and leadership now.... and it would require forcing the existing players, at least for a time, to allow access to their networks... and you know they'd fight that every step of the way... but if the Government or FCC held firm, down the road, say 10 years, the payoff would be clear--- competition. Choices. State of the art networks. Sadly, I think it's very unlikely to happen... no matter which party is in control.
-
Forums » World's Ten Largest IPTV Providers« Anyone know?  


Saturday, 30-Aug 11:51:20 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [336] Comcast 250GB Cap Goes Live October 1
· [223] FBI To Allow Warrantless Investigations
· [166] Industry Reacts To Comcast Cap Plans
· [130] AT&T Thanks Democrats For Telecom Immunity
· [123] Time Warner Cable Cripples TiVO, Gets FCC Fine
· [120] Why Run FTTH When You Can Pretend You Do?
· [78] Friday Open Thread
· [67] Telus CAPS 'Unlimited' EVDO Data Plans
· [65] Game Publishers Follow The RIAA's Lead
· [60] Qwest Defends Not Running FTTH
Most people now reading
· Comcast has new Acceptable Use Policy besides the 250GB cap [Comcast HSI]
· Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions? [Comcast HSI]
· Going to Wire My House for CAT5e [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Steele vs Paypal - Hoax or Not - You Make the Call [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· [iPhone] Did I Buy A Fake iPhone? [All things Macintosh]
· Criss Angel revealed. [56k lookout! (broadband heavy)]
· If anyone wants to see pictures [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Big Ten Network - Comcast Deal OFFICIAL [Comcast Cable TV]