JTRockville
Data Ho
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-28
Rockville, MD
clubs:
edit:
January 16th, @11:48AM
| reply to pnh102
Re: Once Again - Government Holds Us Back
Nothing would stop Verizon from deploying right now, if they owned their own property.
But since they want to install equipment on public property, they have to commit to serving the public interest. |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
| said by JTRockville  :Nothing would stop Verizon from deploying right now, if they owned their own property. But since they want to install equipment on public property, they have to commit to serving the public interest. There is no question about public property. Verizon has public access through being a ILEC/Baby Bell. Its FIOS equipment CAN NOT BE REGULATED by the govt. NO franchise agreement can regulated placement of any components except the set top boxes, since all other elements of FIOS have non-TV uses (internet/phone). The state PUC would have to change the law to regulate FIOS, and if it did, the FCC would strike it down instantly, the FCC promised that next gen broadband/telco tv infrastructure will not be regulated by the FCC (and therefore any state or local govt), otherwise Verizon and ATT would have never built any of it, it it had to resell it to CLECs. |
|
JTRockville
Data Ho
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-28
Rockville, MD
clubs:
 ·LINGO
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·surpasshosting
 ·Verizon FIOS
| said by patcat88 :There is no question about public property. Verizon has public access through being a ILEC/Baby Bell. Its FIOS equipment CAN NOT BE REGULATED by the govt. Then the government isn't holding anything up, are they?
said by patcat88 :Well at the rate this negotiation is going, prepare to wait 5 years for FIOS. As you stated above, the government isn't stopping Verizon from deploying fiber wherever they like - under their existing agreement. |
|
