SyNiSt3r
join:2007-04-26
Morristown, TN
| reply to BF69
Re: So Charter is going to go to metered service huh?
The real question is can they afford to go metered.
They suck, Everyone knows they suck and who is going to put up with suckie service that has a cap.
I guess time will tell but this crap has to stop.
Raising rates, Capped services. Enough is enough.
Its time for them to stop nickle and diming us to death and start working on the issues they have. |
|
Phugg
join:2004-09-30
Riverbank, CA | Or just sell out to Comcast , So I can get my free service back. |
|
markopoleo
join:2003-04-02
Bonne Terre, MO
 ·Charter Pipeline
| reply to SyNiSt3r
said by SyNiSt3r  :The real question is can they afford to go metered. They suck IMO, I think they suck and who is going to put up with suckie service that has a cap. I guess time will tell but this crap has to stop. Raising rates, Capped services. Enough is enough. Its time for them to stop nickle and diming ME to death and start working on the issues they have. I fixed it for you. Since you don't represent everyone. |
|
Lazlow
join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO
| reply to Phugg
I do not see the FCC allowing any of the major player to buy Charter. Charter may be ate up by a bunch of smaller players( like Avenue Broadband) or split up in general. We do not need any of the major companies to get any larger. The fewer the number of large players the more likely that they will unofficially band together and just decide to do stuff. If the top 5 HSI players all switched to metered service at once, what choice would the consumer have? |
|
koma3504
Advocate
Premium
join:2004-06-22
North Richland Hills, TX
| reply to SyNiSt3r
said by SyNiSt3r : Enough is enough. Its time for them to stop nickle and diming us to death and start working on the issues they have. Yea like this issue
Signature: ICMP PING CyberKit 2.2 Windows
Earliest Such Alert: 01-09-2008 12:40:41
Latest Such Alert: 01-16-2008 06:39:00
Sources Triggering This Attack Signature
Source IP FQDN # Alerts (sig) # Alerts (total) # Dsts (sig) # Dsts (total)
71.10.84.144 71-10-84-144.dhcp.roch.mn.charter.com 34 53 1 1
71.12.17.68 71-12-17-068.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 21 21 1 1
71.12.132.50 71-12-132-50.dhcp.mtgm.al.charter.com 13 16 1 1
71.12.17.229 71-12-17-229.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 11 18 1 1
71.9.11.243 71-9-11-243.dhcp.rvsd.ca.charter.com 11 11 1 1
71.13.225.178 71-13-225-178.dhcp.trcy.mi.charter.com 9 18 1 1
71.12.22.207 71-12-22-207.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 9 9 1 1
71.9.0.198 71-9-0-198.dhcp.ccmn.ca.charter.com 7 7 1 1
71.9.90.188 71-9-90-188.dhcp.rvsd.ca.charter.com 5 5 1 1
71.12.17.205 71-12-17-205.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 5 5 1 1
71.9.88.9 71-9-88-9.static.rvsd.ca.charter.com 5 5 1 1
71.12.17.218 71-12-17-218.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 4 4 1 1
71.12.102.128 71-12-102-128.dhcp.mtgm.al.charter.com 4 4 1 1
71.12.21.86 71-12-21-086.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 3 3 1 1
71.9.38.166 71-9-38-166.dhcp.wsco.ca.charter.com 2 2 1 1
71.10.160.158 71-10-160-158.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com 2 2 1 1
71.12.16.99 71-12-16-099.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 2 2 1 1
71.8.115.196 71-8-115-196.dhcp.ftwo.tx.charter.com 2 2 1 1
71.12.20.203 71-12-20-203.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 1 2 1 1
71.85.134.105 71-85-134-105.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 1 2 1 1
71.12.17.71 71-12-17-071.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 1 2 1 1
71.12.101.212 71-12-101-212.dhcp.mtgm.al.charter.com 1 1 1 1
71.12.19.89 71-12-19-089.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 1 1 1 1
71.12.19.17 71-12-19-017.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 1 1 1 1
71.11.223.231 71-11-223-231.dhcp.ftwo.tx.charter.com 1 1 1 1
71.14.143.2 71.14.143.2 1 1 1 1
71.12.21.168 71-12-21-168.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 1 1 1 1
71.9.9.110 71-9-9-110.dhcp.rvsd.ca.charter.com 1 1 1 1
71.12.19.220 71-12-19-220.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com 1 1 1 1
--
† Koma †
If YOu Don't Think It's Possable!! It's Acually A Reality!!The best way to predict the future is to invent it. Alan Kay!!
Ya Don't Know The signal Till Ya Ride It!!
Voice Break's There's Trouble!!!! |
|
Piedough
@charter.com | reply to markopoleo
He represents sane people. Sadly you don't seem to be of that camp. |
|
useless
join:2006-07-16
| Well, it is worth noting:
100,000 office connections over Cat 5 is completely different that 100,000 cable subscribers over coax.
Sikmaz, equating a coax based system to a Cat 5 based system is a bad idea. The thing common might be some fiber or 10 GigE ports. |
|
tsteele93
join:2006-09-16
Greenville, SC
| reply to Lazlow
said by Lazlow :I do not see the FCC allowing any of the major player to buy Charter. Do you base this on the fine job the FCC has done keeping radio stations from being consolidated into only a couple of large companies?  |
|
Lazlow
join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO
| teteele
No, I base that on the current head of the FCC having a hard on for cable and that he is pushing limiting Comcast's(?) market share from getting any larger. If any of the major players would buy Charter that would put their market share at about or above the same level as Comcast. |
|
