<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>$10/mo ?? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19826918</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:19:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:19:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: $10/mo ??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19827012</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : "For as little as $10 a month" statement is the same as "up to 10Mbps download speed."    There is no guarantee that you will  ever see it, but it COULD, MIGHT, MAYBE happen.<br><br>They can't prove it.   Fact is, while white space use is a good idea, statements like that hurt the credibility of the initiative.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19827012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:43:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>$10/mo ??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19826918</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote">They insist such unused white space "could deliver Internet access to every American household for as little as $10 a month, by some estimates."</div>I'd like to see the analysis the Wireless Innovation Alliance did or got elsewhere that came up with that price. It isn't in their link here: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.newamerica.net/files/whitespace%20summary.pdf" >www.newamerica.net/files/whitesp&middot;&middot;&middot;mary.pdf</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19826918</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:29:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
