Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cox Sued By Verizon For Patent Infringement » Here we go...
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Well, here we go. »
« just a thought..  

supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
·Cox VOIP
·Skype
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com

Re: Here we go...

Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ - message board) is once again in the plaintiff's seat in a patent infringement case, this time going after Cox Communications Inc.

Verizon filed papers in Eastern District Court of Virginia on Jan. 11 alleging that Cox violated eight patents related to the technology used for completing IP voice calls. Four of the patents were included in Verizon's suit against Vonage Holdings Corp. (NYSE: VG - message board) last year. (See Vonage Ordered to Pay $58M to Verizon.) Verizon was eventually awarded $120 million in damages in that case.

The suit against Cox raises the question of whether Verizon will go after other Cable MSOs in court as well. "They all adhere to the CableLabs PacketCable architecture," says Alan Breznick, senior analyst with Heavy Reading. "So conceivably they could."

-----

Shouldn't they be suing everyone?

The patents Verizon says Cox is infringing upon:

U.S. Patent No. 6,970,930 (not in Vonage case)
U.S. Patent No. 6,104, 711 (Vonage was found to have infringed)
U.S. Patent No. 6,430,275 (Vonage found not to have infringed)
U.S. Patent No. 6,137,869 (Vonage found not to have infringed)
U.S. Patent No. 6,282,574 (Vonage was found to have infringed)
U.S. Patent No. 6,335,927 (not in Vonage case)
U.S. Patent No. 6,292,481 (not in Vonage case)
U.S. Patent No. 6,636,597 (not in Vonage case)

»www.phoneplusmag.com/hotnews/81h···359.html

I doubt VZ will win this one. Cox won't be hiring idiot lawyers like Vonage. And, why not bring up all the other Cable outfits doing it too? That really does not make much sense. I can see suing Vonage since they were not paying connection fees but Cox does. I pay that $6.50 FCC Access Fee on Cox like I did on Bellsouth.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl

knightmb
Everybody Lies

join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN
·AT&T DSL Service

Re: Here we go...

said by supergirl See Profile :

I doubt VZ will win this one. Cox won't be hiring idiot lawyers like Vonage. And, why not bring up all the other Cable outfits doing it too? That really does not make much sense. I can see suing Vonage since they were not paying connection fees but Cox does. I pay that $6.50 FCC Access Fee on Cox like I did on Bellsouth.
Unfortunately, it's less about details more about convincing a bunch of non-technical people. Verizon vs. Vonage is a good example of that.

supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
·Cox VOIP
·Skype
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com

Re: Here we go...

said by knightmb See Profile :

said by supergirl See Profile :

I doubt VZ will win this one. Cox won't be hiring idiot lawyers like Vonage. And, why not bring up all the other Cable outfits doing it too? That really does not make much sense. I can see suing Vonage since they were not paying connection fees but Cox does. I pay that $6.50 FCC Access Fee on Cox like I did on Bellsouth.
Unfortunately, it's less about details more about convincing a bunch of non-technical people. Verizon vs. Vonage is a good example of that.
Vonage wasn't paying access fees. That's what VZ was pissed over. Cox pays them. Personally, I think IP based calling systems shouldn't be patentably period. It is the future.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl
Forums » Cox Sued By Verizon For Patent InfringementWell, here we go. »
« just a thought..  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 05:19:41 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [194] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [50] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [21] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Google chief: Only miscreants worry about net privacy [Security]