Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T's New SIM Card Plan » Agreement required because of churn
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Correction  
AuthorAll Replies

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

reply to Gilitar
Re: Agreement required because of churn

Honestly.. #2 is all they talk about. #1 is also called "roping a customer"... they've never publicly stated to keep churn low - but it's true. It's also a way to not have to compete... lazy and greed. Yes, I'm using the term greed here for once - because it is.

They've offered NOTHING and want a contract. Seems more and more businesses want contracts for no reason.

"The problem? The deal requires you sign a two-year contract which somewhat defeats the purpose. Carriers have always argued that the contract is to help subsidize the phone. But in this case you're not getting one."

Back in 2005, I already satisfied a Nextel agreement of 1 year. I took my phone to it's own account - already owning the phone, they wanted a 2 year agreement to simply turn on the service to a phone I already owned.

This isn't anything new to AT&T but sure is right up their alley.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

I suppose you could go 'Prepaid' with the pick your plan style.

I do agree... signing a contract WAS to pay for the phone. If anything, paying $25 for a SIM and having it active for a month to month _should_ be ok. If I have to sign a contract AND bring my own phone, then AT&T should discount the service significantly.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

xsiddalx

join:2005-03-11
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Yahoo

reply to fiberguy
What did you ultimately do? Stay with Nextel?

said by fiberguy See Profile :

Honestly.. #2 is all they talk about. #1 is also called "roping a customer"... they've never publicly stated to keep churn low - but it's true. It's also a way to not have to compete... lazy and greed. Yes, I'm using the term greed here for once - because it is.

They've offered NOTHING and want a contract. Seems more and more businesses want contracts for no reason.

"The problem? The deal requires you sign a two-year contract which somewhat defeats the purpose. Carriers have always argued that the contract is to help subsidize the phone. But in this case you're not getting one."

Back in 2005, I already satisfied a Nextel agreement of 1 year. I took my phone to it's own account - already owning the phone, they wanted a 2 year agreement to simply turn on the service to a phone I already owned.

This isn't anything new to AT&T but sure is right up their alley.
Forums » AT&T's New SIM Card Plan« Correction  


Thursday, 03-Dec 12:28:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [121] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [103] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [80] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [63] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [42] Cable Industry's 'Adoption Plus': Altruism Or PR Stunt?
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Equal speeds ruling [Canadian Broadband]
· netTalk tk6000 [VOIP Tech Chat]